linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, amir73il@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] xfs_io: make various commands one-shot only
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:53:26 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161216005326.GK4326@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fec1a6dd-cebd-1ff4-e916-f696139b876e@sandeen.net>

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 12:21:43PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 12/6/16 9:47 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > 
> > It makes no sense to iterate the file table for some xfs_io
> > commands. Some commands are already marked in this way, but lots of
> > them are not and this leads to bad behaviour. For example, the open
> > command will run until the process fd table is full and EMFILE is
> > returned rather than just opening the specified file once.
> 
> Ok, I'm not quite clear on when we should expect commands to be
> "oneshot"
> 
> With freeze, for example, this:
> 
> xfs_io -x -c freeze mnt/file mnt2/file
> 
> will freeze both filesystems today.  With this change,

xfs_freeze will ignore multiple filesystem options, so it only ever
passes a single file to xfs_io.  IOWs, it's behaviour will be
completely unchanged by making the xfs_io freeze command a one-shot
command.

And right now, I think that's the only case we have to care about.
unless someone is actually using xfs_io directly to freeze multiple
filesystems like this, then I think it's better to make it a
one-shot command.

> xfs_io -x -c freeze mnt/file mnt2/file
> 
> freezes the mnt2 filesystem but not mnt.  Is that desired?

It's exactly what the man page says the freeze command does.

> I guess the command /is/ documented as "freeze fs of /current/ file"
> but i wonder if that's just an accident of documentation.

If the man page documents it as operating on the current file,
but instead it freezes all the open files, then that's a bug that
needs fixing.

> ditto for i.e. the inode command, or resblks - why not
> iterate those?

Because they are aimed at single, specific filesystem operations
only. It just doesn't make sense to iterate them across all open
files inside xfs_io. If you have multiple filesystems youneed to
query/modify, then do an xfs_io call for each. 

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-16  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-07  3:47 [PATCH 0/6] xfs_io: fix up command iteration Dave Chinner
2016-12-07  3:47 ` [PATCH 1/6] libxcmd: check CMD_FLAG_GLOBAL inside args_command() Dave Chinner
2016-12-07  3:47 ` [PATCH 2/6] libxcmd: rename args_command to command_iterator Dave Chinner
2016-12-07  3:47 ` [PATCH 3/6] libxcmd: merge command() and iterate_command() Dave Chinner
2016-12-07  3:47 ` [PATCH 4/6] libxcmd: don't check generic library commands Dave Chinner
2016-12-07  3:47 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs_io: make various commands one-shot only Dave Chinner
2016-12-15 18:21   ` Eric Sandeen
2016-12-16  0:53     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-12-16  1:50       ` Eric Sandeen
2016-12-16  4:21         ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-07  3:47 ` [PATCH 6/6] libxcmd: add non-iterating user commands Dave Chinner
2016-12-07  4:49   ` Amir Goldstein
2016-12-07  4:57     ` Amir Goldstein
2016-12-07 14:21     ` Amir Goldstein
2016-12-07 20:16       ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-08 10:14         ` Amir Goldstein
2016-12-08 22:22           ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-15 19:09     ` Eric Sandeen
2017-01-12  5:14 ` [PATCH 0/6] xfs_io: fix up command iteration Amir Goldstein
2017-01-12 12:52   ` Eric Sandeen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-12-16  4:41 [PATCH v2 " Dave Chinner
2016-12-16  4:41 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs_io: make various commands one-shot only Dave Chinner
2016-12-20  8:44   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161216005326.GK4326@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).