From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, eguan@redhat.com,
darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix bogus minleft manipulations
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:20:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161216082044.GB32288@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161215220938.GV4219@dastard>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 09:09:38AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > @@ -3812,7 +3812,6 @@ xfs_bmap_btalloc(
> > args.fsbno = 0;
> > args.type = XFS_ALLOCTYPE_FIRST_AG;
> > args.total = ap->minlen;
> > - args.minleft = 0;
> > if ((error = xfs_alloc_vextent(&args)))
> > return error;
> > ap->dfops->dop_low = true;
>
> But this looks wrong. when combined with the next patch that sets:
>
> args.minleft = xfs_bmap_worst_indlen(ap->ip, args.maxlen);
>
> we've got a minleft value that might be for multigigabyte
> allocation, but now we are only asking for a total allocation
> of minlen, and that might be 1 block. IOWs, shouldn't this "last,
> final attempt" code actually do something like this:
>
> args.maxlen = ap->minlen;
> args.total = ap->minlen;
> args.minleft = xfs_bmap_worst_indlen(ap->ip, args.maxlen);
Yes. And I actually had that in a previous iteration, and it got
dropped at some point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-16 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-13 15:59 minleft fixes Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-13 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix bogus minleft manipulations Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-14 17:35 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-14 19:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-14 21:51 ` Brian Foster
[not found] ` <20161215143430.GB29477@bfoster.bfoster>
2016-12-16 8:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-19 11:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-20 14:17 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-20 21:45 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-15 22:09 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-16 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-01-04 6:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-04 8:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-13 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: calculate minleft correctly for bmap allocations Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-14 18:24 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-13 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: adjust allocation length in xfs_alloc_space_available Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-14 18:24 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-14 19:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-15 20:41 ` Libor Klepáč
2016-12-16 8:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-16 0:28 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-16 8:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-18 23:55 ` Dave Chinner
2016-12-13 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: don't rely on ->total " Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-14 18:30 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-14 19:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-14 21:51 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-15 8:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-15 12:00 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-14 10:51 ` minleft fixes Eryu Guan
2016-12-15 10:24 ` Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161216082044.GB32288@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).