linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix COW writeback race
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:44:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117134421.GB12426@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484639331-2137-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:48:51AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Due to the way how xfs_iomap_write_allocate tries to convert the whole
> found extents from delalloc to real space we can run into a race
> condition with multiple threads doing writes to this same extent.
> For the non-COW case that is harmless as the only thing that can happen
> is that we call xfs_bmapi_write on an extent that has already been
> converted to a real allocation.  For COW writes where we move the extent
> from the COW to the data fork after I/O completion the race is, however,
> not quite as harmless.  In the worst case we are now calling
> xfs_bmapi_write on a region that contains hole in the COW work, which
> will trip up an assert in debug builds or lead to file system corruption
> in non-debug builds.  This seems to be reproducible with workloads of
> small O_DSYNC write, although so far I've not managed to come up with
> a with an isolated reproducer.
> 

Any reason we don't try to address the core race rather than shake up
the affected code to accommodate it? I ask for a couple reasons: 1.) I'm
not quite following the specific race from the description and 2.) I
considered doing the exact same thing at first for the eofblocks i_size
issue, but more digging rooted out the problem in the eofblocks code.
This one may not be as straightforward a fix, of course... (but if not,
the commit log should probably explain why).

> The fix for the issue is relatively simple:  tell xfs_bmapi_write
> that we are only asked to convert delayed allocations and skip holes
> in that case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h |  6 +++++-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c       |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 44773c9..ceae779 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -4514,8 +4514,6 @@ xfs_bmapi_write(
>  	int			n;		/* current extent index */
>  	xfs_fileoff_t		obno;		/* old block number (offset) */
>  	int			whichfork;	/* data or attr fork */
> -	char			inhole;		/* current location is hole in file */
> -	char			wasdelay;	/* old extent was delayed */
>  
>  #ifdef DEBUG
>  	xfs_fileoff_t		orig_bno;	/* original block number value */
> @@ -4603,22 +4601,41 @@ xfs_bmapi_write(
>  	bma.firstblock = firstblock;
>  
>  	while (bno < end && n < *nmap) {
> -		inhole = eof || bma.got.br_startoff > bno;
> -		wasdelay = !inhole && isnullstartblock(bma.got.br_startblock);
> +		bool			need_alloc = false, wasdelay = false;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Make sure we only reflink into a hole.
> -		 */
> -		if (flags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)
> -			ASSERT(inhole);
> -		if (flags & XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK)
> -			ASSERT(!inhole);
> +		/* in hole or beyoned EOF? */
> +		if (eof || bma.got.br_startoff > bno) {
> +			if (flags & XFS_BMAPI_DELALLOC) {
> +				/*
> +				 * For the COW fork we can reasonably get a
> +				 * request for converting an extent that races
> +				 * with other threads already having converted
> +				 * part of it, as there converting COW to
> +				 * regular blocks is not protected using the
> +				 * IOLOCK.
> +				 */
> +				ASSERT(flags & XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK);
> +				if (!(flags & XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK)) {
> +					error = -EIO;
> +					goto error0;
> +				}

What happens in this case if eof is true? It looks like got could be
bogus, yet we still carry on using it in the post-allocation part of the
loop. The fact that the allocation code breaks out of the loop if
allocation doesn't occur is a bit of a red flag that the post-allocation
code may very well expect to always have an allocated mapping.

That aside... if we do want to do something like this, I wonder whether
it's more cleanly handled by the caller.

Brian

> +			} else {
> +				need_alloc = true;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * Make sure we only reflink into a hole.
> +			 */
> +			ASSERT(!(flags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP));
> +			if (isnullstartblock(bma.got.br_startblock))
> +				wasdelay = true;
> +		}
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * First, deal with the hole before the allocated space
>  		 * that we found, if any.
>  		 */
> -		if (inhole || wasdelay) {
> +		if (need_alloc || wasdelay) {
>  			bma.eof = eof;
>  			bma.conv = !!(flags & XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT);
>  			bma.wasdel = wasdelay;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
> index cecd094..cdef87d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct xfs_extent_free_item
>  /* Map something in the CoW fork. */
>  #define XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK	0x200
>  
> +/* Only convert delalloc space, don't allocate entirely new extents */
> +#define XFS_BMAPI_DELALLOC	0x400
> +
>  #define XFS_BMAPI_FLAGS \
>  	{ XFS_BMAPI_ENTIRE,	"ENTIRE" }, \
>  	{ XFS_BMAPI_METADATA,	"METADATA" }, \
> @@ -120,7 +123,8 @@ struct xfs_extent_free_item
>  	{ XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT,	"CONVERT" }, \
>  	{ XFS_BMAPI_ZERO,	"ZERO" }, \
>  	{ XFS_BMAPI_REMAP,	"REMAP" }, \
> -	{ XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK,	"COWFORK" }
> +	{ XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK,	"COWFORK" }, \
> +	{ XFS_BMAPI_DELALLOC,	"DELALLOC" }
>  
>  
>  static inline int xfs_bmapi_aflag(int w)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index ca137b7..7ee8629 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_allocate(
>  	xfs_trans_t	*tp;
>  	int		nimaps;
>  	int		error = 0;
> -	int		flags = 0;
> +	int		flags = XFS_BMAPI_DELALLOC;
>  	int		nres;
>  
>  	if (whichfork == XFS_COW_FORK)
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-17 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-17  7:48 [PATCH v2] xfs: fix COW writeback race Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-17 13:44 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-01-17 14:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-17 17:14     ` Brian Foster
2017-01-17 18:39       ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-17 18:58         ` Brian Foster
2017-01-17 20:02           ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-18  8:45       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-18  8:49       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170117134421.GB12426@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).