From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix COW writeback race
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:44:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170117134421.GB12426@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1484639331-2137-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:48:51AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Due to the way how xfs_iomap_write_allocate tries to convert the whole
> found extents from delalloc to real space we can run into a race
> condition with multiple threads doing writes to this same extent.
> For the non-COW case that is harmless as the only thing that can happen
> is that we call xfs_bmapi_write on an extent that has already been
> converted to a real allocation. For COW writes where we move the extent
> from the COW to the data fork after I/O completion the race is, however,
> not quite as harmless. In the worst case we are now calling
> xfs_bmapi_write on a region that contains hole in the COW work, which
> will trip up an assert in debug builds or lead to file system corruption
> in non-debug builds. This seems to be reproducible with workloads of
> small O_DSYNC write, although so far I've not managed to come up with
> a with an isolated reproducer.
>
Any reason we don't try to address the core race rather than shake up
the affected code to accommodate it? I ask for a couple reasons: 1.) I'm
not quite following the specific race from the description and 2.) I
considered doing the exact same thing at first for the eofblocks i_size
issue, but more digging rooted out the problem in the eofblocks code.
This one may not be as straightforward a fix, of course... (but if not,
the commit log should probably explain why).
> The fix for the issue is relatively simple: tell xfs_bmapi_write
> that we are only asked to convert delayed allocations and skip holes
> in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h | 6 +++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 44773c9..ceae779 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -4514,8 +4514,6 @@ xfs_bmapi_write(
> int n; /* current extent index */
> xfs_fileoff_t obno; /* old block number (offset) */
> int whichfork; /* data or attr fork */
> - char inhole; /* current location is hole in file */
> - char wasdelay; /* old extent was delayed */
>
> #ifdef DEBUG
> xfs_fileoff_t orig_bno; /* original block number value */
> @@ -4603,22 +4601,41 @@ xfs_bmapi_write(
> bma.firstblock = firstblock;
>
> while (bno < end && n < *nmap) {
> - inhole = eof || bma.got.br_startoff > bno;
> - wasdelay = !inhole && isnullstartblock(bma.got.br_startblock);
> + bool need_alloc = false, wasdelay = false;
>
> - /*
> - * Make sure we only reflink into a hole.
> - */
> - if (flags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP)
> - ASSERT(inhole);
> - if (flags & XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK)
> - ASSERT(!inhole);
> + /* in hole or beyoned EOF? */
> + if (eof || bma.got.br_startoff > bno) {
> + if (flags & XFS_BMAPI_DELALLOC) {
> + /*
> + * For the COW fork we can reasonably get a
> + * request for converting an extent that races
> + * with other threads already having converted
> + * part of it, as there converting COW to
> + * regular blocks is not protected using the
> + * IOLOCK.
> + */
> + ASSERT(flags & XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK);
> + if (!(flags & XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK)) {
> + error = -EIO;
> + goto error0;
> + }
What happens in this case if eof is true? It looks like got could be
bogus, yet we still carry on using it in the post-allocation part of the
loop. The fact that the allocation code breaks out of the loop if
allocation doesn't occur is a bit of a red flag that the post-allocation
code may very well expect to always have an allocated mapping.
That aside... if we do want to do something like this, I wonder whether
it's more cleanly handled by the caller.
Brian
> + } else {
> + need_alloc = true;
> + }
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Make sure we only reflink into a hole.
> + */
> + ASSERT(!(flags & XFS_BMAPI_REMAP));
> + if (isnullstartblock(bma.got.br_startblock))
> + wasdelay = true;
> + }
>
> /*
> * First, deal with the hole before the allocated space
> * that we found, if any.
> */
> - if (inhole || wasdelay) {
> + if (need_alloc || wasdelay) {
> bma.eof = eof;
> bma.conv = !!(flags & XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT);
> bma.wasdel = wasdelay;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
> index cecd094..cdef87d 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct xfs_extent_free_item
> /* Map something in the CoW fork. */
> #define XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK 0x200
>
> +/* Only convert delalloc space, don't allocate entirely new extents */
> +#define XFS_BMAPI_DELALLOC 0x400
> +
> #define XFS_BMAPI_FLAGS \
> { XFS_BMAPI_ENTIRE, "ENTIRE" }, \
> { XFS_BMAPI_METADATA, "METADATA" }, \
> @@ -120,7 +123,8 @@ struct xfs_extent_free_item
> { XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT, "CONVERT" }, \
> { XFS_BMAPI_ZERO, "ZERO" }, \
> { XFS_BMAPI_REMAP, "REMAP" }, \
> - { XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK, "COWFORK" }
> + { XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK, "COWFORK" }, \
> + { XFS_BMAPI_DELALLOC, "DELALLOC" }
>
>
> static inline int xfs_bmapi_aflag(int w)
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index ca137b7..7ee8629 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_allocate(
> xfs_trans_t *tp;
> int nimaps;
> int error = 0;
> - int flags = 0;
> + int flags = XFS_BMAPI_DELALLOC;
> int nres;
>
> if (whichfork == XFS_COW_FORK)
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-17 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-17 7:48 [PATCH v2] xfs: fix COW writeback race Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-17 13:44 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-01-17 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-17 17:14 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-17 18:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-17 18:58 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-17 20:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-18 8:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-18 8:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170117134421.GB12426@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).