linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: do not call xfs_buf_hash_destroy on a NULL pag
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 12:47:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170120204703.GF12985@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <113b0890-ef1f-0a27-34c1-95785a4d1d17@sandeen.net>

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 01:26:12PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 1/20/17 8:26 AM, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > 
> > If pag cannot be allocated, the current error exit path will trip
> > a null pointer deference error when calling xfs_buf_hash_destroy
> > with a null pag.  Fix this by adding a new error exit lable and
> > jumping to this, avoiding the hash destroy and unnecessary kmem_free
> > on pag.
> > 
> > Fixes CoverityScan CID#1397628 ("Dereference after null check")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> Hm, I think this leaves the code with issues.
> 
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> > index 9b9540d..4e66cd19 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> > @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ xfs_initialize_perag(
> >  
> >  		pag = kmem_zalloc(sizeof(*pag), KM_MAYFAIL);
> >  		if (!pag)
> > -			goto out_unwind;
> > +			goto out_unwind_pags;
> 
> So let's say we got to index == 3 at the top of the loop, and
> this fails.
> 
> We succeeded in initializing 0, 1, and 2, but 3 failed.
> 
> So we go to out_unwind_pags with index == 3...
> 
> >  		pag->pag_agno = index;
> >  		pag->pag_mount = mp;
> >  		spin_lock_init(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
> > @@ -242,6 +242,7 @@ xfs_initialize_perag(
> >  out_unwind:
> >  	xfs_buf_hash_destroy(pag);
> >  	kmem_free(pag);
> > +out_unwind_pags:
> 
> ... where index == 3, and:
> 
> >  	for (; index > first_initialised; index--) {
> >  		pag = radix_tree_delete(&mp->m_perag_tree, index);
> 
> this should fail, because it never got inserted, and...
> 
> >  		xfs_buf_hash_destroy(pag);
> 
> this still tries to destroy a NULL pag, no?
> 
> There also seems to be an existing issue w/the code where ag 0 is
> never torn down in the error case, because first_initialized doesn't
> stay set to 0:
> 
>                 if (!first_initialised)
>                         first_initialised = index;
> 
> And we don't even tear down ag 1, because:
> 
> >  	for (; index > first_initialised; index--) {
> >  		pag = radix_tree_delete(&mp->m_perag_tree, index);
> 
> when the loop reaches the first initialized AG, it stops.
> 
> So we seem to always leak at least 2 if we managed to get far enough
> to initialize them.

Ugh, yeah, the the whole error exit from that function is fubar...
Anyone want to clean this up?

--D

> 
> -Eric
> 
> > 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-20 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-20 14:26 [PATCH] xfs: do not call xfs_buf_hash_destroy on a NULL pag Colin King
2017-01-20 16:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-20 19:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-01-20 20:47   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-01-20 23:04     ` Colin Ian King
2017-01-24 15:04       ` Bill O'Donnell
2017-01-24 18:34         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-24 21:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Bill O'Donnell
2017-01-24 21:21   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-24 21:28     ` Bill O'Donnell
2017-01-25 19:04 ` [PATCH v3] " Bill O'Donnell
2017-01-26 17:58   ` Eric Sandeen
2017-01-26 18:55     ` Bill O'Donnell
2017-01-26 20:27       ` Eric Sandeen
2017-01-28 19:19 ` [PATCH] xfs: correct null checks and error processing in xfs_initialize_perag Bill O'Donnell
2017-02-03 22:57   ` Eric Sandeen
2017-02-06 17:08   ` [PATCH v2] " Bill O'Donnell
2017-02-06 19:25     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-02-07 16:54   ` [PATCH v3] " Bill O'Donnell
2017-02-07 20:49     ` Eric Sandeen
2017-02-07 20:59     ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170120204703.GF12985@birch.djwong.org \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).