From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: go straight to real allocations for direct I/O COW writes
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:59:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170124135937.GA25885@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170124135044.GA60234@bfoster.bfoster>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 08:50:45AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Is this reproducible on the current tree or only with this patch series?
It's only reproducible with the series modified to your review comments.
> Also, shouldn't the end_io handler only remap the range of the write,
> regardless of whether the initial allocation ended up preallocating over
> holes or purely a shared range?
The end_io handler is caller for the whole size of the write. That's
mostly because we don't have an object corresponding to a write_begin
call.
> Perhaps what you are saying here is that we have a single dio write that
> spans wider than a shared data fork extent..?
Yes.
> In that case, we iterate
> the range in xfs_reflink_reserve_cow(). We'd skip the start of the range
> that is a hole in the data fork, but as you say, the
> xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc() call for the part of the I/O on the shared
> extent can widen the COW fork allocation to before the extent in the
> data fork, possibly to before the start of the I/O. (Thus we end up
> allocating COW blocks over the hole anyways...).
The problem is the following.
We have a file with the following layout
HHHHHHHHHHHHDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
where H is hole and D is data. The H to D boundary is not aligned
to the cowextsize.
The direct I/O code now does a first pass allocating an extent for
H and copies data to it. Then in the next step it goes on to D
and unshares it. It then enlarges the extent into the end of the
previously H range. It does however not copy data into H again,
as the iomap iterator is past it. The ->end_io routine however
is called for the hole range, and will move the just allocated
rounding before H back into the data fork, replacing the valid data
writtent just before.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-24 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-05 21:05 reflink COW improvements Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: reject all unaligned direct writes to reflinked files Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 18:59 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: go straight to real allocations for direct I/O COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 19:00 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-07 19:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 19:46 ` Brian Foster
2016-12-08 4:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-24 8:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 13:50 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 13:59 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-01-24 15:02 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 16:17 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 17:43 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 20:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 20:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-25 0:09 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-27 17:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-27 17:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: allocate direct I/O COW blocks in iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-06 2:09 ` reflink COW improvements Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170124135937.GA25885@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).