linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: go straight to real allocations for direct I/O COW writes
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:08:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170124200855.GA1385@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170124174318.GH60234@bfoster.bfoster>

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:43:18PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> Hmm, that's not what I'm seeing (not that it really matters, but I'm
> curious if I'm missing something):

Yeah, I can reproduce this on mainline.  Turns out the it was done
by the align call in xfs_bmap_btalloc that even my before run had
removed.

Took me some time to spin my head around this.

Btw, I think we have a nasty race in the current DIO code that might
expose stale data, but this is just the same kind of head spinning
exercise for now:

Thread 1 writes a range from B to c

                    B --------- C

a little later thread 2 writes from A to B

        A --------- B

but the code preallocates beyond B into the range where thread
1 has just written, but ->end_io hasn't been called yet.
But once ->end_io is called thread 2 has already allocated
up to the extent size hint into the write range of thread 1,
so the end_io handler will splice the unintialized blocks from
that preallocation back into the file right after B.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-05 21:05 reflink COW improvements Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: reject all unaligned direct writes to reflinked files Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 18:59   ` Brian Foster
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: go straight to real allocations for direct I/O COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 19:00   ` Brian Foster
2016-12-07 19:37     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-07 19:46       ` Brian Foster
2016-12-08  4:23         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-24  8:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 13:50           ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 13:59             ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 15:02               ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 15:09                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 16:17                   ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 16:21                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-24 17:43                       ` Brian Foster
2017-01-24 20:08                         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-01-24 20:10                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-25  0:09                           ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-27 17:44                             ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-27 17:48                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-05 21:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: allocate direct I/O COW blocks in iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-06  2:09 ` reflink COW improvements Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170124200855.GA1385@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).