From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:58842 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754945AbdA0PIY (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:08:24 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:59:30 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: use per-AG reservations for the finobt Message-ID: <20170127145930.GA14983@lst.de> References: <1485335667-22435-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1485335667-22435-3-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , darrick.wong@oracle.com, bfoster@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:08:00PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > This seems to cause regressions for me, at least on generic/108, xfs/004 xfs/004 isn't really broken, it just needs a change every time we tune some reservations. I've been pondering to just drop that sub-check. I can't run generic/108 as it requires a modular scsi_debug, and none of my test setups uses modular kernels, so I'm curious on how that could get broken by this change.