From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Martin Svec <martin.svec@zoner.cz>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Quota-enabled XFS hangs during mount
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:42:42 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170128224242.GD316@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170127170734.GA49571@bfoster.bfoster>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:07:34PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> The problem looks like a race between dquot reclaim and quotacheck. The
> high level sequence of events is as follows:
>
> - During quotacheck, xfs_qm_dqiterate() walks the physical dquot
> buffers and queues them to the delwri queue.
> - Next, kswapd kicks in and attempts to reclaim a dquot that is backed
> by a buffer on the quotacheck delwri queue. xfs_qm_dquot_isolate()
> acquires the flush lock and attempts to queue to the reclaim delwri
> queue. This silently fails because the buffer is already queued.
>
> From this point forward, the dquot flush lock is not going to be
> released until the buffer is submitted for I/O and completed via
> quotacheck.
> - Quotacheck continues on to the xfs_qm_flush_one() pass, hits the
> dquot in question and waits on the flush lock to issue the flush of
> the recalculated values. *deadlock*
>
> There are at least a few ways to deal with this. We could do something
> granular to fix up the reclaim path to check whether the buffer is
> already queued or something of that nature before we actually invoke the
> flush. I think this is effectively pointless, however, because the first
> part of quotacheck walks and queues all physical dquot buffers anyways.
>
> In other words, I think dquot reclaim during quotacheck should probably
> be bypassed.
....
> Note that I think this does mean that you could still have low memory
> issues if you happen to have a lot of quotas defined..
Hmmm..... Really needs fixing.
I think submitting the buffer list after xfs_qm_dqiterate() and
waiting for completion will avoid this problem.
However, I suspect reclaim can still race with flushing, so we need
to detect "stuck" dquots, submit the delwri buffer queue and wait,
then flush the dquot again.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-28 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-01 16:45 Quota-enabled XFS hangs during mount Martin Svec
2016-11-01 21:58 ` Dave Chinner
2016-11-02 16:31 ` Martin Svec
2016-11-03 1:31 ` Dave Chinner
2016-11-03 12:04 ` Martin Svec
2016-11-03 20:40 ` Dave Chinner
2017-01-23 9:44 ` Martin Svec
2017-01-23 13:44 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-23 22:06 ` Dave Chinner
2017-01-24 13:17 ` Martin Svec
2017-01-25 15:36 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-25 22:17 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-26 17:46 ` Martin Svec
2017-01-26 19:12 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-27 13:06 ` Martin Svec
2017-01-27 17:07 ` Brian Foster
2017-01-27 20:49 ` Martin Svec
2017-01-27 21:00 ` Martin Svec
2017-01-27 23:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-01-28 22:42 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2017-01-30 15:31 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170128224242.GD316@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.svec@zoner.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).