linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 36/51] xfs: dont rely on ->total in xfs_alloc_space_available
Date: Thu,  2 Feb 2017 19:37:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170202183346.993154632@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170202183345.067336143@linuxfoundation.org>

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

commit 12ef830198b0d71668eb9b59f9ba69d32951a48a upstream.

->total is a bit of an odd parameter passed down to the low-level
allocator all the way from the high-level callers.  It's supposed to
contain the maximum number of blocks to be allocated for the whole
transaction [1].

But in xfs_iomap_write_allocate we only convert existing delayed
allocations and thus only have a minimal block reservation for the
current transaction, so xfs_alloc_space_available can't use it for
the allocation decisions.  Use the maximum of args->total and the
calculated block requirement to make a decision.  We probably should
get rid of args->total eventually and instead apply ->minleft more
broadly, but that will require some extensive changes all over.

[1] which creates lots of confusion as most callers don't decrement it
once doing a first allocation.  But that's for a separate series.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c |    7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c
@@ -1995,7 +1995,7 @@ xfs_alloc_space_available(
 	int			flags)
 {
 	struct xfs_perag	*pag = args->pag;
-	xfs_extlen_t		longest;
+	xfs_extlen_t		alloc_len, longest;
 	xfs_extlen_t		reservation; /* blocks that are still reserved */
 	int			available;
 
@@ -2005,15 +2005,16 @@ xfs_alloc_space_available(
 	reservation = xfs_ag_resv_needed(pag, args->resv);
 
 	/* do we have enough contiguous free space for the allocation? */
+	alloc_len = args->minlen + (args->alignment - 1) + args->minalignslop;
 	longest = xfs_alloc_longest_free_extent(args->mp, pag, min_free,
 			reservation);
-	if ((args->minlen + args->alignment + args->minalignslop - 1) > longest)
+	if (longest < alloc_len)
 		return false;
 
 	/* do we have enough free space remaining for the allocation? */
 	available = (int)(pag->pagf_freeblks + pag->pagf_flcount -
 			  reservation - min_free - args->minleft);
-	if (available < (int)args->total)
+	if (available < (int)max(args->total, alloc_len))
 		return false;
 
 	/*



  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-02 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20170202183345.067336143@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-02-02 18:37 ` [PATCH 4.9 33/51] xfs: bump up reserved blocks in xfs_alloc_set_aside Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:37 ` [PATCH 4.9 34/51] xfs: fix bogus minleft manipulations Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:37 ` [PATCH 4.9 35/51] xfs: adjust allocation length in xfs_alloc_space_available Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-02-02 18:37 ` [PATCH 4.9 37/51] xfs: dont print warnings when xfs_log_force fails Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:38 ` [PATCH 4.9 46/51] xfs: fix COW writeback race Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:38 ` [PATCH 4.9 47/51] xfs: verify dirblocklog correctly Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:38 ` [PATCH 4.9 49/51] xfs: extsize hints are not unlikely in xfs_bmap_btalloc Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:38 ` [PATCH 4.9 50/51] xfs: clear _XBF_PAGES from buffers when readahead page Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:38 ` [PATCH 4.9 51/51] xfs: fix bmv_count confusion w/ shared extents Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170202183346.993154632@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).