From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 37/51] xfs: dont print warnings when xfs_log_force fails
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 19:37:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170202183347.043226331@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170202183345.067336143@linuxfoundation.org>
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
commit 84a4620cfe97c9d57e39b2369bfb77faff55063d upstream.
There are only two reasons for xfs_log_force / xfs_log_force_lsn to fail:
one is an I/O error, for which xlog_bdstrat already logs a warning, and
the second is an already shutdown log due to a previous I/O errors. In
the latter case we'll already have a previous indication for the actual
error, but the large stream of misleading warnings from xfs_log_force
will probably scroll it out of the message buffer.
Simply removing the warnings thus makes the XFS log reporting significantly
better.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_log.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
@@ -3324,12 +3324,8 @@ xfs_log_force(
xfs_mount_t *mp,
uint flags)
{
- int error;
-
trace_xfs_log_force(mp, 0, _RET_IP_);
- error = _xfs_log_force(mp, flags, NULL);
- if (error)
- xfs_warn(mp, "%s: error %d returned.", __func__, error);
+ _xfs_log_force(mp, flags, NULL);
}
/*
@@ -3473,12 +3469,8 @@ xfs_log_force_lsn(
xfs_lsn_t lsn,
uint flags)
{
- int error;
-
trace_xfs_log_force(mp, lsn, _RET_IP_);
- error = _xfs_log_force_lsn(mp, lsn, flags, NULL);
- if (error)
- xfs_warn(mp, "%s: error %d returned.", __func__, error);
+ _xfs_log_force_lsn(mp, lsn, flags, NULL);
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-02 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170202183345.067336143@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-02-02 18:37 ` [PATCH 4.9 33/51] xfs: bump up reserved blocks in xfs_alloc_set_aside Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:37 ` [PATCH 4.9 34/51] xfs: fix bogus minleft manipulations Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:37 ` [PATCH 4.9 35/51] xfs: adjust allocation length in xfs_alloc_space_available Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:37 ` [PATCH 4.9 36/51] xfs: dont rely on ->total " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-02-02 18:38 ` [PATCH 4.9 46/51] xfs: fix COW writeback race Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:38 ` [PATCH 4.9 47/51] xfs: verify dirblocklog correctly Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:38 ` [PATCH 4.9 49/51] xfs: extsize hints are not unlikely in xfs_bmap_btalloc Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:38 ` [PATCH 4.9 50/51] xfs: clear _XBF_PAGES from buffers when readahead page Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-02-02 18:38 ` [PATCH 4.9 51/51] xfs: fix bmv_count confusion w/ shared extents Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170202183347.043226331@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).