linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: reject all unaligned direct writes to reflinked files
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 15:01:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170202230126.GP9134@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485985359-971-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>

On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:42:36PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We currently fall back from direct to buffered writes if we detect a
> remaining shared extent in the iomap_begin callback.  But by the time
> iomap_begin is called for the potentially unaligned end block we might
> have already written most of the data to disk, which we'd now write
> again using buffered I/O.  To avoid this reject all writes to reflinked
> files before starting I/O so that we are guaranteed to only write the
> data once.
> 
> The alternative would be to unshare the unaligned start and/or end block
> before doing the I/O. I think that's doable, and will actually be
> required to support reflinks on DAX file system.  But it will take a
> little more time and I'd rather get rid of the double write ASAP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c  |  7 +++++++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 12 +-----------
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index bbb9eb6..06236bf 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -527,6 +527,13 @@ xfs_file_dio_aio_write(
>  	if ((iocb->ki_pos & mp->m_blockmask) ||
>  	    ((iocb->ki_pos + count) & mp->m_blockmask)) {
>  		unaligned_io = 1;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * We can't properly handle unaligned direct I/O to reflink
> +		 * files yet, as we can't unshare a partial block.
> +		 */
> +		if (xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip))
> +			return -EREMCHG;
>  		iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL;
>  	} else {
>  		iolock = XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index 767208f..d17aa3b 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -1026,17 +1026,7 @@ xfs_file_iomap_begin(
>  		if (error)
>  			goto out_unlock;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * We're here because we're trying to do a directio write to a
> -		 * region that isn't aligned to a filesystem block.  If the
> -		 * extent is shared, fall back to buffered mode to handle the
> -		 * RMW.
> -		 */
> -		if (!(flags & IOMAP_REPORT) && shared) {
> -			trace_xfs_reflink_bounce_dio_write(ip, &imap);

Can you either port the tracepoint to the new hunk or just kill it
entirely?

(If you opt for killing it, I'll just remove it from xfs_trace.h when I
import this patch.)

Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

--D

> -			error = -EREMCHG;
> -			goto out_unlock;
> -		}
> +		ASSERT((flags & IOMAP_REPORT) || !shared);
>  	}
>  
>  	if ((flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO)) && xfs_is_reflink_inode(ip)) {
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-02 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-01 21:42 reflink direct I/O improvements V2 Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-01 21:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: reject all unaligned direct writes to reflinked files Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-02 23:01   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-02-01 21:42 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: introduce xfs_aligned_fsb_count Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-02 22:56   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-02-01 21:42 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: go straight to real allocations for direct I/O COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-01 21:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: allocate direct I/O COW blocks in iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-03  0:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-02-03 10:53     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-05 20:13       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170202230126.GP9134@birch.djwong.org \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).