From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:50754 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751543AbdBIHVc (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2017 02:21:32 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 08:21:07 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: allocate direct I/O COW blocks in iomap_begin Message-ID: <20170209072107.GA6134@lst.de> References: <20170206074738.13978-1-hch@lst.de> <20170206074738.13978-5-hch@lst.de> <20170207014149.GE12378@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170207014149.GE12378@birch.djwong.org> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 05:41:49PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > I'm going to run this series (and all the other stuff I've collected for > 4.11) overnight and if nothing screams then you can consider this series: Can you push your tree out? I'd like to verify what made it before heading off for a long weekend tonight. I'm especially curious if the discard work made it.