linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: allocate direct I/O COW blocks in iomap_begin
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 23:53:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170209075322.GA6824@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170209072107.GA6134@lst.de>

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 08:21:07AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 05:41:49PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > I'm going to run this series (and all the other stuff I've collected for
> > 4.11) overnight and if nothing screams then you can consider this series:
> 
> Can you push your tree out?  I'd like to verify what made it before
> heading off for a long weekend tonight. I'm especially curious if
> the discard work made it.

It's very late tonight, so all the shiny polish is missing, but here's
what's in my tree for 4.11 right now:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git/log/?h=xfs-4.11-merge-20170208

Testing isn't done yet, but xfs/222 seems to be blowing up at
ASSERT(!rwsem_is_locked(&inode->i_rwsem)) in xfs_super.c fairly
consistently with blocksize=1k.  I haven't been able to reproduce it
quickly (i.e. without running the whole test suite) so I can't tell if
that's a side effect of something else blowing up or what.  generic/300
seems to blow up periodically and then blows the same assert on umount,
also in the 1k case.  xfs/348 fuzzes the fs, causes "kernel memory
exposure!" BUGs and then asserts with the same i_rwsem thing.
 
The all-defaults 4k blocksize test runs w/ regular disk and pmem all
finished without any new fireworks, though.

(You'll note I didn't merge the duplicate "xfs: improve handling of busy
extents in the low-level allocator"; if you want that done, please let me
know.)

--D

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-09  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-06  7:47 reflink direct I/O improvements V3 Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-06  7:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: introduce xfs_aligned_fsb_count Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-06  7:47 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: return the converted extent in __xfs_reflink_convert_cow Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-06  7:47 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: go straight to real allocations for direct I/O COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-07  1:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-02-06  7:47 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: allocate direct I/O COW blocks in iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-07  1:41   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-02-09  7:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-09  7:53       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-02-09  7:58         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-09  8:00           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-09 17:22           ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-06 18:41 ` reflink direct I/O improvements V3 Darrick J. Wong
2017-02-06 20:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-01 21:42 reflink direct I/O improvements V2 Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-01 21:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: allocate direct I/O COW blocks in iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-03  0:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-02-03 10:53     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-02-05 20:13       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170209075322.GA6824@birch.djwong.org \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).