From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47512 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751060AbdBJEVB (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2017 23:21:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:20:40 +0800 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: [BUG 4.10-rc7] sb_fdblocks inconsistency in xfs/297 test Message-ID: <20170210042040.GA21408@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20170210035348.GA7075@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170210035348.GA7075@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.com On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:53:48AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > Hi, > > I was testing 4.10-rc7 kernel and noticed that xfs_repair reported XFS > corruption after fstests xfs/297 test. This didn't happen with 4.10-rc6 Seems generic/269 reproduces it easily too. I also saw xfs/167 fail on ppc64 host because of this issue, but rarely. Thanks, Eryu