From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] xfs: quota deadlock fixes
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:01:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170216120150.GA11750@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216074234.GV24562@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 03:42:34PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:40:42AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a collection of several quota related deadlock fixes for
> > problems that have been reported to the list recently.
> >
> > Patch 1 fixes the low memory quotacheck problem reported by Martin[1].
> > Dave is CC'd as he had comments on this particular thread that started a
> > discussion, but I hadn't heard anything back since my last response.
> >
> > Patch 2 fixes a separate problem I ran into while attempting to
> > reproduce Eryu's xfs/305 hang report[2].
> >
> > Patches 3-5 fix the actual problem reported by Eryu, which is a quotaoff
> > deadlock reproduced by xfs/305.
> >
> > Further details are included in the individual commit log descriptions.
> > Thoughts, reviews, flames appreciated.
> >
> > Eryu,
> >
> > I've run several hundred iterations of this on your reproducer system
> > without reproducing the hang. I have reproduced a reset overnight but
> > still haven't been able to grab a stack trace from that occurrence (I'll
> > try again today/tonight with better console logging). I suspect this is
> > a separate problem (possibly just an ASSERT() failure as this is a DEBUG
> > kernel), but I'd appreciate any testing you can run against these
> > patches to verify.
>
> Sure, I'll give them a test and report back once I got results. Thanks
> for looking into it!
>
Thanks. The test I was running ran overnight again (over 1k iterations)
without any problems. I'm logged off your server now..
Brian
> Eryu
>
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg01901.html
> > [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg03835.html
> >
> > Brian Foster (5):
> > xfs: bypass dquot reclaim to avoid quotacheck deadlock
> > xfs: allocate quotaoff transactions up front to avoid log deadlock
> > xfs: support ability to wait on new inodes
> > xfs: update ag iterator to support wait on new inodes
> > xfs: wait on new inodes during quotaoff dquot release
> >
> > fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > fs/xfs/xfs_icache.h | 8 +++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 4 +++-
> > fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c | 11 +++++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_qm.h | 1 +
> > fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > 6 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-16 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-15 15:40 [PATCH 0/5] xfs: quota deadlock fixes Brian Foster
2017-02-15 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] xfs: bypass dquot reclaim to avoid quotacheck deadlock Brian Foster
2017-02-16 22:37 ` Dave Chinner
2017-02-17 18:30 ` Brian Foster
2017-02-17 23:12 ` Dave Chinner
2017-02-18 12:55 ` Brian Foster
2017-02-15 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] xfs: allocate quotaoff transactions up front to avoid log deadlock Brian Foster
2017-04-26 21:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-27 12:03 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-27 15:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-02-15 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] xfs: support ability to wait on new inodes Brian Foster
2017-04-27 21:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-02-15 15:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] xfs: update ag iterator to support " Brian Foster
2017-04-27 21:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-02-15 15:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: wait on new inodes during quotaoff dquot release Brian Foster
2017-04-27 21:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-02-16 7:42 ` [PATCH 0/5] xfs: quota deadlock fixes Eryu Guan
2017-02-16 12:01 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-02-17 6:53 ` Eryu Guan
2017-02-17 17:54 ` Brian Foster
2017-02-20 3:52 ` Eryu Guan
2017-02-20 13:25 ` Brian Foster
2017-02-22 15:35 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170216120150.GA11750@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).