From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Resent-Message-ID: <20170227145811.6zhb32dh2fj5kr7l@eorzea.usersys.redhat.com> Resent-To: sandeen@sandeen.net Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:39418 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750952AbdBWKPW (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 05:15:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 02:15:19 -0800 From: Jaegeuk Kim Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] vfs: hoist {XFS, EXT4}_IOC_{GOING, SHUT}DOWN to the VFS Message-ID: <20170223101518.GA1769@jaegeuk.local> References: <20170223075230.GB5837@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Chao Yu Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o , Al Viro , Chao Yu , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Hello, On 02/23, Chao Yu wrote: > Hi Darrick, > > On 2017/2/23 15:52, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > ext4 and XFS expose the same shutdown ioctl with the same parameters, > > so let's hoist the whole mess into the vfs headers. > > Could you cover f2fs in this patch since f2fs has already supported SHUTDOWN ioctl? It's funny that I submitted a similar patch two years ago along with f2fs support. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5814991/ Thanks,