From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.com, jeffm@suse.com,
okurz@suse.com, lpechacek@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] mkfs.xfs: add mkfs.xfs.conf support
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 15:56:15 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170304045615.GL17542@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6de0c7e4-8d20-ea90-fc49-d47a787e3939@sandeen.net>
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 09:49:58PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 3/3/17 5:13 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > This series adds mkfs.xfs.conf support, so that options can now be
> > shoved into a configuration file. This enables certain defaults to be
> > saved for folks sticking to certain values, but more importantly it
> > also enables distributions to override certain defaults so that new
> > filesystems remain compatible with older distributions.
> >
> > This has been based on top of xfsprogs-dev v4.9.0-rc1.
> >
> > Given we already have an existinsg infrastructure to validate argument
> > values this reuses that infrastructure by first adding helpers and porting
> > over the argument parsing suppor to use these helpers.
>
> I'm not necessarily the final word on this, but I have to say
> I'm not a huge fan of having mkfs config files. I've lived
> through that in mke2fs land, and my personal feeling is that
> it can lead to confusion when distros start shipping config
> files with different defaults than upstream ships in the
> code itself.
>
> I guess I can see the argument for shipping old/compatible
> defaults with newer progs and older kernels, but by the
> time a distro ships a custom old default config file they could
> also patch out the new features just as easily... (which
> is also confusing, I guess ;) )
>
> After 25+ years of no external config file, I'm concerned
> about principal of least surprise when the same xfsprogs version
> starts behaving differently on different boxes based on a new
> file that popped up in /etc ...
>
> At the very least, I would like to /not/ ship or install any
> config file with xfsprogs by default; the code itself should
> be the canonical, single point of truth for defaults for a stock
> "make && make install" installation.
Hence my suggestion of libconfig - it can /write config files/ based
on the current mkfs config. So there's no need to ship default
config files - if a user wants a special config they can use mkfs to
generate it and they can install it appropriately.
e.g. 'mkfs -W <options>' outputs a config file to stdout that
matches the config specified on the command line, but does not make
the filesystem (similar to the "-n" option). If no options are
specified, the default config is emitted....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-04 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-03 23:13 [PATCH 0/9] mkfs.xfs: add mkfs.xfs.conf support Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-03 23:13 ` [PATCH 1/9] mkfs.xfs: add helper to parse command line options Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-03 23:13 ` [PATCH 2/9] mkfs.xfs: move dopts to struct mkfs_xfs_opts Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-03 23:13 ` [PATCH 3/9] mkfs.xfs: move iopts to " Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-03 23:13 ` [PATCH 4/9] mkfs.xfs: move lopts " Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-03 23:13 ` [PATCH 5/9] mkfs.xfs: move mopts " Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-03 23:13 ` [PATCH 6/9] mkfs.xfs: move nopts " Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-03 23:13 ` [PATCH 7/9] mkfs.xfs: move ropts " Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-03 23:13 ` [PATCH 8/9] mkfs.xfs: use parse_subopts() to parse sopts Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-03 23:13 ` [PATCH 9/9] mkfs.xfs: add mkfs.xfs.conf parse support Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-03 23:55 ` Dave Chinner
2017-03-09 5:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-03-03 23:24 ` [PATCH 0/9] mkfs.xfs: add mkfs.xfs.conf support Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-04 3:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-03-04 4:56 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2017-03-06 0:08 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-03-07 20:07 ` Jeff Mahoney
2017-03-07 20:09 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-03-06 8:50 ` Jan Kara
2017-03-09 0:16 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-03-09 0:51 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-09 4:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-03-09 10:12 ` Jan Tulak
2017-03-09 14:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-03-09 15:21 ` Jan Tulak
2017-03-09 17:57 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-03-09 22:34 ` Dave Chinner
2017-04-24 5:00 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-04-24 7:26 ` Jan Tulak
2017-04-24 8:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-11 22:46 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-11 22:57 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-05-11 23:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-12 0:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-05-12 16:05 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-05-12 17:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-12 17:05 ` Jeff Mahoney
2017-05-12 17:30 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-11 23:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-05-11 23:19 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170304045615.GL17542@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpechacek@suse.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=okurz@suse.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).