From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.145]:38969 "EHLO ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750971AbdCRHIu (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Mar 2017 03:08:50 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 18:08:47 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22] mkfs.xfs: Make stronger conflict checks Message-ID: <20170318070847.GY17542@dastard> References: <20170315160017.27805-1-jtulak@redhat.com> <20170316233845.GY28800@wotan.suse.de> <2030b8be-4fe0-c767-4c3a-0e5ff25c4362@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Jan Tulak Cc: Eric Sandeen , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 01:57:10PM +0100, Jan Tulak wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > On 3/16/17 4:38 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:59:55PM +0100, Jan Tulak wrote: > > I'll probably keep flinging comments on various patches as I read them, > > some of it may be helpful in terms of just learning some best practice > > for patches, but TBH I'm still trying to wrap my head around the big change > > and purpose. > > > > OK. We can talk about it next week personally if needed. And decide > whether it is worth to reorganise this set into no-op and op changes. It's better to discuss this sort of thing on the mailing list so that every sees the explanations and understands the reasons for the changes being made.... -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com