linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: verify inline directory data forks
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:10:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170327171006.GF5738@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170316211255.GU17542@dastard>

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 08:12:56AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:28:55AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > When we're reading or writing the data fork of an inline directory,
> > check the contents to make sure we're not overflowing buffers or eating
> > garbage data.  xfs/348 corrupts an inline symlink into an inline
> > directory, triggering a buffer overflow bug.
> 
> I think the check is fine, but from a structural point of view they
> are in the wrong place. i.e.  the functions xfs_iformat_local() and
> xfs_iflush_fork() should not be doing any content specific checks
> and verification. All they do is marshall the fork data to and from
> in-memory and on-disk formats - the contents of the forks should be
> opaque to them.
> 
> IOWs, incoming fork contents validity should be checked in
> xfs_iformat_fork() after we call xfs_iformat_local(), outgoing fork
> validity is checked in xfs_iflush_int() before calling
> xfs_iflush_fork().

Sorry for pushing the button prematurely.  I just sent out a patch to
clean this up and address a few other issues.

--D

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com

      reply	other threads:[~2017-03-27 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-15  7:28 [PATCH] xfs: verify inline directory data forks Darrick J. Wong
2017-03-15 15:00 ` Brian Foster
2017-03-15 17:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-03-16 21:12 ` Dave Chinner
2017-03-27 17:10   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170327171006.GF5738@birch.djwong.org \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).