From: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PROGS] xfs_io: Allow setting multiple mode flags for fallocate()
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:14:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170331041452.e7lvxwq3hla3kims@Haydn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170321215458.GC17542@dastard>
On Wednesday 03/22 at 08:54 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 09:33:50PM -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > On 03/17/2017 11:55 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > >On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 06:26:09PM -0700, Calvin Owens wrote:
> > >>This allows testing FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE|FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE.
> > >
> > >Which is normally done through the "fpunch" command, which explains
> > >why nobody has noticed this.
> >
> > Ah okay, I was assuming parity with syscalls in the commands and picked
> > the first one I saw ;)
> >
> > >>Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
> > >>---
> > >> io/prealloc.c | 10 +++++-----
> > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >>diff --git a/io/prealloc.c b/io/prealloc.c
> > >>index a9d66cc..2a4bcdc 100644
> > >>--- a/io/prealloc.c
> > >>+++ b/io/prealloc.c
> > >>@@ -201,19 +201,19 @@ fallocate_f(
> > >> while ((c = getopt(argc, argv, "cikpu")) != EOF) {
> > >> switch (c) {
> > >> case 'c':
> > >>- mode = FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE;
> > >>+ mode |= FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE;
> > >> break;
> > >> case 'i':
> > >>- mode = FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE;
> > >>+ mode |= FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE;
> > >> break;
> > >> case 'k':
> > >>- mode = FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE;
> > >>+ mode |= FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE;
> > >> break;
> > >> case 'p':
> > >>- mode = FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE;
> > >>+ mode |= FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE;
> > >> break;
> > >> case 'u':
> > >>- mode = FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE;
> > >>+ mode |= FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE;
> > >> break;
> > >
> > >NACK. We should not allow users to set invalid combinations
> > >of commands such as 'falloc -cipu ...' - this would set the flags
> > >(FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE | FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE |
> > >FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE) and will always
> > >error out.
> >
> > Isn't it potentially useful to test invalid behavior?
>
> Yes, but exhaustive testing of syscall option validity is not what
> xfs_io is for - xfs_io is for giving test scripts access to the syscall
> functionality, and so if someone passes an invalid combination of
> options it should fail.
>
> > >The use of FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE for the FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE command
> > >is essentially for documentation purposes - it does not do
> > >truncation, hence the FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE flag was added to it to
> > >ensure developers understand that it does not truncate the file and
> > >change EOF.
> > >
> > >IOWs, the fix needed to make the 'falloc -p' command work is really
> > >just this:
> > >
> > >- mode = FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE;
> > >+ mode = FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE;
> >
> > My thinking was just "allow full exercising of the syscall", fpunch works
> > for my testcase so if you'd prefer not to do that we can just drop this :)
>
> If you want to go test invalid combinations, write a syscall test
> for ltp.
>
> > It might be worth cleaning up 'falloc' though: '-k' doesn't really make
> > sense on its own right?
>
> As I said in my last response: "falloc -k" is a valid usage for
> preallocation because it means "allow preallocation beyond EOF".
> i.e. future writes that extend the file will not need to allocate
> blocks....
The point I'm trying to make is that it's fundamentally confusing to have
switches like "-k" and "-p" for ORable flags in a syscall argument, when
the switches don't themselves support being combined. ZERO_RANGE for
example is ORable with KEEP_SIZE or valid on its own; if "-z" were added
we couldn't blame the user for thinking that "-z -k" is a valid thing to
do, could we?
But this is pedantic and obviously relatively unimportant, patch below.
Thanks,
Calvin
---8<---
From: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 20:50:55 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] io/prealloc: Fix "falloc -p" to pass KEEP_SIZE
Otherwise, the syscall just returns -EOPPNOTSUPP.
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
---
io/prealloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/io/prealloc.c b/io/prealloc.c
index a9d66cc..1a1c9ca 100644
--- a/io/prealloc.c
+++ b/io/prealloc.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ fallocate_f(
mode = FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE;
break;
case 'p':
- mode = FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE;
+ mode = FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE|FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE;
break;
case 'u':
mode = FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE;
--
2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-31 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-18 1:26 [PATCH][PROGS] xfs_io: Allow setting multiple mode flags for fallocate() Calvin Owens
2017-03-18 6:55 ` Dave Chinner
2017-03-20 4:33 ` Calvin Owens
2017-03-21 21:54 ` Dave Chinner
2017-03-31 4:14 ` Calvin Owens [this message]
2017-04-04 19:26 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170331041452.e7lvxwq3hla3kims@Haydn \
--to=calvinowens@fb.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).