Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: move the inline directory verifiers

["Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>]

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 09:07:43AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:41:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > I lost track of the fact that the first patch went into -rc and thus
> > > > confused myself over where this should apply. This applies to 4.11.0-rc4
> > > > and looks fine to me:
> > > 
> > > Does anyone have a problem if I send this to Linus for 4.11-rc5?
> > > I'd rather atone for my sins sooner than later. :)
> > 
> > There's no urgency required here - it's just a cleanup patch. The
> > code in the tree works fine, so why risk adding regressions
> > at a late stage? Just add it to the for-next queue and let it soak
> > until the merge window.
> 
> Is current Linus tree ok?  I'm pretty sure a recent Linus tree fell
> over when running the dir fuzzers for me.  Which commit would the
> latest actual fix be?

I think xfs/348 causes -rc4 to fall over if CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG=y due to
the XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURNs that shouldn't be there.

--D

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html