From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: split the reflink remap from the block allocation path
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 09:36:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170410073616.GA6132@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170403121833.7825-1-hch@lst.de>
Any chance to get some reviews on this series?
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 02:18:27PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We've run into various problems due to the fact that the reflink remap
> code reuses the xfs_bmapi_write codepath for setting up the extent list
> entries and abuses the firstblock field for that purpose.
>
> This series fixes this by creating an entirely separate xfs_bmapi_remap
> path that is much simpler than xfs_bmapi_write and does not need to
> overload the firstblock field.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-10 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-03 12:18 split the reflink remap from the block allocation path Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-03 12:18 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: fix integer truncation in xfs_bmap_remap_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10 16:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-03 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: remove attr fork handling in xfs_bmap_finish_one Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10 17:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-10 17:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-03 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: pass individual arguments to xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_real Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10 17:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-10 17:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-03 12:18 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: introduce xfs_bmapi_remap Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10 19:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-11 5:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-03 12:18 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: remove xfs_bmap_remap_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-03 17:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-03 12:18 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: remove bmap block allocation retries Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10 19:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-10 7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-04-03 12:11 split the reflink remap from the block allocation path Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-03 12:10 Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170410073616.GA6132@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).