public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
To: L A Walsh <xfs@tlinx.org>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: allow mounting w/crc-checking disabled? (was Re: filesystem dead, xfs_repair won't help)
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:57:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170411145721.7d3676a1@harpe.intellique.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58EBC972.6040509@tlinx.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1278 bytes --]

Le Mon, 10 Apr 2017 11:05:38 -0700
L A Walsh <xfs@tlinx.org> écrivait:

> 	I'm sure it wouldn't be trivial, but creating a separate
> file system, "XFS2" from the original XFS sources that responded
> to data or metadata corruption by returning empty data where
> it was impossible to return anything useful instead of flagging
> the disk as "bad", would be a way to allow data recovery to
> the extent that it made sense (assuming the original sources
> couldn't do the same toggling off a config-flag).

It would probably much easier to add an option to mount the filesystem
without crc, similar to "norecovery", that doesn't replay the journal.
It would be of course read-only, but in a similar case it would be much
easier and practical for everyone.

So far I believed that metadata CRCs were a promise of safer
filesystems; now that I've setup several multi-hundred terabytes
volumes with CRC enabled, I'm getting nervous...

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac     |   Direction technique
                    |   Intellique
                    |	<eflorac@intellique.com>
                    |   +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[-- Attachment #2: Signature digitale OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-11 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-10  9:23 filesystem dead, xfs_repair won't help Avi Kivity
2017-04-10  9:42 ` Avi Kivity
2017-04-10 15:35   ` Brian Foster
2017-04-11  7:46     ` Avi Kivity
2017-04-11 11:30       ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-04-11 11:40         ` Avi Kivity
2017-04-11 12:00           ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-04-11 12:03             ` Avi Kivity
2017-04-11 12:49               ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-04-11 13:07                 ` Avi Kivity
2017-04-11 16:13                   ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-04-11 16:44                     ` Avi Kivity
2017-04-11 16:48                       ` Eric Sandeen
2017-04-12 15:15                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 15:34                           ` Eric Sandeen
2017-04-12 15:45                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 16:15                               ` Avi Kivity
2017-04-12 16:20                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 16:22                                   ` Eric Sandeen
2017-04-12 16:24                                     ` Avi Kivity
2017-04-12 16:22                                   ` Avi Kivity
2017-04-12 17:41                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-10  9:43 ` allow mounting w/crc-checking disabled? (was Re: filesystem dead, xfs_repair won't help) L A Walsh
2017-04-10 16:01   ` Eric Sandeen
2017-04-10 18:05     ` L A Walsh
2017-04-11 12:57       ` Emmanuel Florac [this message]
2017-04-11 13:34         ` Eric Sandeen
2017-04-11 16:18           ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-04-11 16:34             ` Eric Sandeen
2017-04-10 15:49 ` filesystem dead, xfs_repair won't help Eric Sandeen
2017-04-10 16:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-11  7:48   ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170411145721.7d3676a1@harpe.intellique.com \
    --to=eflorac@intellique.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@tlinx.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox