From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: split the reflink remap from the block allocation path V3
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:30:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170412103013.9355-1-hch@lst.de> (raw)
We've run into various problems due to the fact that the reflink remap
code reuses the xfs_bmapi_write codepath for setting up the extent list
entries and abuses the firstblock field for that purpose.
This series fixes this by creating an entirely separate xfs_bmapi_remap
path that is much simpler than xfs_bmapi_write and does not need to
overload the firstblock field.
Changes since V2:
- add a missing call to xfs_iread_extents
Changes since V1:
- warn when encountering invalid forks in bmap item recovery
- tidy up the xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_real declaration
- trivial indentation change in xfs_bmapi_remap
next reply other threads:[~2017-04-12 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-12 10:30 Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-04-12 10:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: fix integer truncation in xfs_bmap_remap_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 10:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: remove attr fork handling in xfs_bmap_finish_one Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 10:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: pass individual arguments to xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_real Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 10:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: introduce xfs_bmapi_remap Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 19:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-19 18:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-19 18:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-24 14:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-24 21:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-12 10:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: remove xfs_bmap_remap_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 10:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: remove bmap block allocation retries Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170412103013.9355-1-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).