From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] xfs: remove xfs_bmap_remap_alloc
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:28:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170412192807.GP8502@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170412080059.GA22618@lst.de>
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:00:59AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:44:20PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 08:00:26AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Looks like _bmapi_remap needs to be able to _iread_extents() if the
> > > > data fork hasn't been loaded during log recovery.
> > >
> > > Yeah, probably. I'll respin once more with that included.
> >
> > Unfortunately, even after adding in the necessary loading code I still
> > get -ENOSPC back from xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_real which causes log
> > recovery to fail.
>
> The test in your configuration already fails with -ENOSPC for me on
> for-next..
Crap, there are actually /two/ problems here:
The first problem is that xfs_reflink_end_cow reserves only enough
blocks to handle adding 1 extent. This is problematic if we fragment
free space, have to do CoW, and then have to perform multiple bmap btree
expansions, which g/187 seems to hit.
The second problem is that the BUI recovery routine doesn't reserve
/any/ blocks to handle btree splits, so when the first problem takes the
fs down, recovery also fails.
Evidently with 1k blocks we can hit this fairly often in g/187 if the
scratch fs is big enough.
Ok, patch soon. <sigh>
--D
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-12 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-11 11:10 split the reflink remap from the block allocation path V2 Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] xfs: fix integer truncation in xfs_bmap_remap_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs: remove attr fork handling in xfs_bmap_finish_one Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-11 22:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: pass individual arguments to xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_real Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-11 21:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] xfs: introduce xfs_bmapi_remap Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-11 22:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: remove xfs_bmap_remap_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-11 23:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-12 5:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 5:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-12 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 6:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-04-12 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 19:28 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-04-11 11:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] xfs: remove bmap block allocation retries Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-04-12 10:30 split the reflink remap from the block allocation path V3 Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-12 10:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: remove xfs_bmap_remap_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-03 12:18 split the reflink remap from the block allocation path Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-03 12:18 ` [PATCH 5/6] xfs: remove xfs_bmap_remap_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-03 17:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170412192807.GP8502@birch.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).