From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] xfs: fix bmap minleft calculation
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:59:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170418075937.GC23085@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170417141939.GD41659@bfoster.bfoster>
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:19:39AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:05:13AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > We need to set a proper minleft value even if we didn't do a previous
> > allocation in the transaction, as we can't switch to a different AG
> > after allocating the data extent.
> >
>
> Hmm, the code currently does set minleft if we haven't done a previous
> allocation (firstblock == NULLFSBLOCK). Do you mean "even if we have
> done a previous allocation?"
Yeah.
> The code seems Ok, but we also currently reserve enough blocks for a
> full btree split in a write transaction and afaict only allocate a
> single extent per-transaction. The current code expects to select an AG
> with those additional blocks available and then not if a subsequent
> allocation occurs (by setting minleft = 0), presumably because the check
> was already made. So I'm wondering if this fixes a problem that has been
> observed or is just cleaning up the code..?
It's fixing a problem that is currently masked by the low space allocator.
Once we remove that just try again without reservations for good luck
mode we need to get all the reservations right.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-18 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-13 8:05 fix space reservations underneath xfs_bmapi_write Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-13 8:05 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfs: introduce xfs_trans_blk_res Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-13 18:28 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-13 8:05 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfs: rewrite xfs_da_grow_inode_int Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-13 18:28 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-13 8:05 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfs: remove the XFS_BMAPI_CONTIG flag Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-13 18:28 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-13 8:05 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: remove an unsafe retry in xfs_bmbt_alloc_block Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-13 18:30 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-14 7:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-17 14:19 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-18 7:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-18 14:18 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-25 7:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-25 12:11 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-13 8:05 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: remove the total argument to xfs_bmap_local_to_extents Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-17 14:19 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-13 8:05 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: fix bmap minleft calculation Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-17 14:19 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-18 7:59 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-04-13 8:05 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: fix space reservation in xfs_bmbt_alloc_block Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-17 14:19 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-13 8:05 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: introduce a XFS_BMAPI_BESTEFFORT flag Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-17 18:08 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-18 7:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-18 14:18 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-13 8:05 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: kill the dop_low flag Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-17 18:08 ` Brian Foster
2017-04-13 8:05 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: remove xfs_bmap_alloc Christoph Hellwig
2017-04-17 18:08 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170418075937.GC23085@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox