From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"LIU, Fei" <james.liu@alibaba-inc.com>,
xiongwei.jiang@alibaba-inc.com, boqian.zy@alibaba-inc.com,
sheng.qiu@alibaba-inc.com, Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: xlog_write: reservation ran out
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 13:16:29 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170505031629.GE17542@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170504115102.GA3248@bfoster.bfoster>
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 07:51:02AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Seems reasonable. I suppose if we do the check at this level rather than
> in the caller, we could move the CIL insert code to the last step before
> we drop ->xc_cil_lock and have an accurate account of the reservation
> pulled off the transaction. E.g.:
>
> {
> ...
> tp->t_ticket->t_curr_res -= len;
> ctx->space_used += len;
>
> /* dump tp on overrun prior to item removal */
> if (tp->t_ticket->t_curr_res < 0)
> xlog_print_tic(tp)
>
> /* reposition to CIL ... */
> list_for_each_entry(lidp, &tp->t_items, lid_trans) {
> ...
> list_move_tail(...);
> }
> spin_unlock(&cil->xc_cil_lock);
> }
>
> ... where xlog_print_tic() can call xlog_print_tic_res() and then dump
> the t_items list as above.
We shouldn't call xlog_print_tic_res() while holding a spinlock
because it calls xfs_force_shutdown(). So I think all the overrun
checks and prints need to be outside the xc_cil_lock.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-05 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAF1ivSZeYhnzh6CPZViYUNFXdm33hhTA_CzP7V745QociEEnKg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-04-28 20:24 ` xlog_write: reservation ran out Ming Lin
2017-04-28 20:56 ` Ming Lin
2017-05-01 6:10 ` Ming Lin
2017-05-01 13:12 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-01 17:41 ` Ming Lin
2017-05-01 18:48 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-01 20:18 ` Ming Lin
2017-05-02 23:51 ` Dave Chinner
2017-05-03 14:10 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-03 15:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-05-03 16:15 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-04 0:37 ` Dave Chinner
2017-05-04 0:34 ` Dave Chinner
2017-05-04 11:51 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-05 3:16 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170505031629.GE17542@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=boqian.zy@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.liu@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlin@kernel.org \
--cc=sheng.qiu@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=sweil@redhat.com \
--cc=xiongwei.jiang@alibaba-inc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).