From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Properly retry failed inode items in case of error during buffer writeback
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 20:35:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170616183510.GC21846@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170616105445.3314-3-cmaiolino@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:54:45PM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> When a buffer has been failed during writeback, the inode items into it
> are kept flush locked, and are never resubmitted due the flush lock, so,
> if any buffer fails to be written, the items in AIL are never written to
> disk and never unlocked.
>
> This causes unmount operation to hang due these items flush locked in AIL,
What type of hang? If it has occurred in production is there a trace somewhere?
what does it look like?
You said you would work on an xfstest for this, how's that going? Otherewise
a commit log description of how to reproduce would be useful.
> but this also causes the items in AIL to never be written back, even when
> the IO device comes back to normal.
>
> I've been testing this patch with a DM-thin device, creating a
> filesystem larger than the real device.
>
> When writing enough data to fill the DM-thin device, XFS receives ENOSPC
> errors from the device, and keep spinning on xfsaild (when 'retry
> forever' configuration is set).
>
> At this point, the filesystem can not be unmounted because of the flush locked
> items in AIL, but worse, the items in AIL are never retried at all
> (once xfs_inode_item_push() will skip the items that are flush locked),
> even if the underlying DM-thin device is expanded to the proper size.
Jeesh.
If the above issue is a real hang, shoudl we not consider a sensible stable fix
to start off with ?
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-16 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-16 10:54 [PATCH 0/2 V4] Resubmit items failed during writeback Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-16 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/2 V4] xfs: Add infrastructure needed for error propagation during buffer IO failure Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-19 13:48 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-20 7:15 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-16 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Properly retry failed inode items in case of error during buffer writeback Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-16 11:06 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-16 18:35 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2017-06-16 19:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-16 19:37 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-16 19:45 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-06-19 10:59 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-20 16:52 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-20 17:20 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-20 18:05 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-21 10:10 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-21 15:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-20 18:38 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-20 7:01 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-20 16:24 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-06-21 11:51 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-19 13:49 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-19 15:09 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-19 13:51 ` [PATCH 0/2 V4] Resubmit items failed during writeback Brian Foster
2017-06-19 17:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-19 18:51 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-21 0:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-21 10:15 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-21 11:03 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-21 11:51 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-21 16:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-22 12:05 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-22 12:40 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-30 11:09 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-30 11:33 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-30 12:22 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-30 17:01 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-07-03 8:37 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-06-21 16:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-11 13:57 [PATCH 0/2] " Carlos Maiolino
2017-05-11 13:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Properly retry failed inode items in case of error during buffer writeback Carlos Maiolino
2017-05-11 15:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-05-12 8:19 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-05-11 17:08 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-12 8:21 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-05-12 11:37 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-17 11:47 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-05-17 0:57 ` Dave Chinner
2017-05-17 10:41 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-05-19 0:22 ` Dave Chinner
2017-05-19 11:27 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-19 23:39 ` Dave Chinner
2017-05-20 11:46 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-21 23:19 ` Dave Chinner
2017-05-22 12:51 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-23 11:23 ` Dave Chinner
2017-05-23 16:22 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-24 1:06 ` Dave Chinner
2017-05-24 12:42 ` Brian Foster
2017-05-24 13:26 ` Carlos Maiolino
2017-05-24 17:08 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170616183510.GC21846@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).