From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix recovery failure when log record header wraps log end
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 08:11:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170703121108.GA26149@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170701043803.GT5874@birch.djwong.org>
On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 09:38:03PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:40:33AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > The high-level log recovery algorithm consists of two loops that
> > walk the physical log and process log records from the tail to the
> > head. The first loop handles the case where the tail is beyond the
> > head and processes records up to the end of the physical log. The
> > subsequent loop processes records from the beginning of the physical
> > log to the head.
> >
> > Because log records can wrap around the end of the physical log, the
> > first loop mentioned above must handle this case appropriately.
> > Records are processed from in-core buffers, which means that this
> > algorithm must split the reads of such records into two partial
> > I/Os: 1.) from the beginning of the record to the end of the log and
> > 2.) from the beginning of the log to the end of the record. This is
> > further complicated by the fact that the log record header and log
> > record data are read into independent buffers.
> >
> > The current handling of each buffer correctly splits the reads when
> > either the header or data starts before the end of the log and wraps
> > around the end. The data read does not correctly handle the case
> > where the prior header read wrapped or ends on the physical log end
> > boundary. blk_no is incremented to or beyond the log end after the
> > header read to point to the record data, but the split data read
> > logic triggers, attempts to read from an invalid log block and
> > ultimately causes log recovery to fail. This can be reproduced
> > fairly reliably via xfstests tests generic/047 and generic/388 with
> > large iclog sizes (256k) and small (10M) logs.
> >
> > If the record header read has pushed beyond the end of the physical
> > log, the subsequent data read is actually contiguous. Update the
> > data read logic to detect the case where blk_no has wrapped, mod it
> > against the log size to read from the correct address and issue one
> > contiguous read for the log data buffer. The log record is processed
> > as normal from the buffer(s), the loop exits after the current
> > iteration and the subsequent loop picks up with the first new record
> > after the start of the log.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> > index b6a40bd..9efcd12 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> > @@ -5371,10 +5371,20 @@ xlog_do_recovery_pass(
> > bblks = (int)BTOBB(be32_to_cpu(rhead->h_len));
> > blk_no += hblks;
> >
> > - /* Read in data for log record */
> > - if (blk_no + bblks <= log->l_logBBsize) {
> > - error = xlog_bread(log, blk_no, bblks, dbp,
> > - &offset);
> > + /*
> > + * Read the log record data in multiple reads if it
> > + * wraps around the end of the log. Note that if the
> > + * header already wrapped, blk_no could point past the
> > + * end of the log. The record data is contiguous in
> > + * that case.
> > + */
> > + if (blk_no + bblks <= log->l_logBBsize ||
> > + blk_no >= log->l_logBBsize) {
> > + /* mod blk_no in case the header wrapped and
> > + * pushed it beyond the end of the log */
> > + error = xlog_bread(log,
> > + blk_no % log->l_logBBsize,
>
> I /think/ this is ok, though isn't this 64-bit division? ^
>
Yep, looks like it. Will fix.. thanks for catching that..
Brian
> --D
>
> > + bblks, dbp, &offset);
> > if (error)
> > goto bread_err2;
> > } else {
> > --
> > 2.7.5
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-03 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-27 14:40 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: log recovery wrap and tail overwrite fixes Brian Foster
2017-06-27 14:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: fix recovery failure when log record header wraps log end Brian Foster
2017-07-01 4:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-07-03 12:11 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-06-27 14:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: always verify the log tail during recovery Brian Foster
2017-07-01 4:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-07-03 12:11 ` Brian Foster
2017-06-27 14:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: fix log recovery corruption error due to tail overwrite Brian Foster
2017-07-01 5:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-07-03 12:13 ` Brian Foster
2017-07-03 16:27 ` Brian Foster
2017-07-03 16:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-27 14:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: add log item pinning error injection tag Brian Foster
2017-07-01 3:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-27 14:50 ` [PATCH] tests/xfs: test for log recovery failure after tail overwrite Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170703121108.GA26149@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).