From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
"'linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Weird xfs_repair error
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 13:11:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170717171129.GA57771@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170711152340.4cd5dff9@harpe.intellique.com>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:23:52PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Fri, 7 Jul 2017 08:36:33 -0700
> "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> écrivait:
>
> > > fatal error -- name create failed in lost+found (28), filesystem
> > > may be out of space
> >
> > Would be helpful to have a metadump of this goobered-up lost+found
> > fs...
> >
>
> The metadump is here for anyone who would like to have a look:
>
> http://update2.intellique.com/pub/bign.metadump.xz
>
> The filesystem is about 115 TiB.
>
Thanks for posting this. The first thing to note is that this filesystem
is severely corrupted. Nonetheless, I've been playing around with trying
to get the latest for-next xfs_repair to run through this fs (via gdb)
and have definitely hit a few issues:
- xfs_sb_verify() was changed to use bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn rather than
bp->b_bn in libxfs commit 85428dd23f ("xfs: fix superblock inprogress
check"). b_maps isn't allocated if the buffer was initialized with
libxfs_initbuf() (rather than libxfs_initbuf_map()). This causes a
sigsegv here, though only if I disable -O2 optimization for some
reason that I haven't dug into yet.
- libxfs commit 0268fdc3fe ("xfs: remove xfs_trans_get_block_res")
replaced the use of xfs_trans_get_block_res() in
xfs_bmbt_alloc_block() which causes the -ENOSPC error. The previous
function was hardcoded to return 1 such that this would never occur.
- The recently added directory sf format verifier (xfs_iformat_fork() ->
xfs_dir2_sf_verify()) seems to cause a premature repair failure in at
least one case.
I was able to eventually get repair to complete with some quick hacks to
bypass those issues. I did have to run repair two or three times to get
the fs to a clean state. The fs mounts and otherwise appears clean to
xfs_repair, but it's not clear to me how usable the resulting fs really
is (repair is for fs consistency after all, not necessarily data
recovery). Note that lost+found appears to be loaded with 18T of data
across almost 2 million inodes. :/
Brian
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
> | Intellique
> | <eflorac@intellique.com>
> | +33 1 78 94 84 02
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-17 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-06 13:30 Weird xfs_repair error Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-06 13:48 ` Brian Foster
2017-07-06 14:49 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-06 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2017-07-07 11:36 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-07 11:50 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-07 15:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-07-10 17:29 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-11 13:23 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-17 17:11 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-07-24 14:27 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-24 14:51 ` Brian Foster
2017-07-25 16:44 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-25 17:16 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-25 19:22 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170717171129.GA57771@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).