From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_db: properly set inode type
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:07:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170717210736.GF4224@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67d06f4f-73fc-577c-a12f-132821386597@sandeen.net>
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 03:51:50PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>
> On 06/28/2017 11:01 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> I guess there's also the problem that if inodesize != 512 then what are
> >> we targeting, anyway? If inodesize = 256 then we can only hit
> >> even-numbered inodes (not so bad) but if inodesize > 512 then do we jump
> >> back to wherever the inode starts? Or just give the user what they
> >> asked for, even if it's garbage?
> > Oh, hum. Right, big inodes....
> >
> > So I'm trying to go from disk location to inode number, but the current
> > disk location may not even be the start of an inode. Hell. Well, I'm
> > sure I could craft a test to disallow "type inode" if the current location
> > cannot be on an inode boundary. But is that too clever? Should the
> > debug tool just do what the user asks?
> >
> >> (FWIW I was fine with xfs_db being dumb and giving you exactly what you
> >> point it at, even if that makes no sense. :P)
> > yeah, if you do "daddr 0" "type agf" it'll squawk, too, so it's fine to
> > do the dumb user's bidding...
>
> So as I have it today, issuing "type inode" will actually re-align you
> to an inode offset even if you're not on one:
>
> xfs_db> sb 0
> xfs_db> addr rootino
> xfs_db> daddr
> current daddr is 128
> xfs_db> daddr 129
> xfs_db> type inode
> xfs_db> daddr
> current daddr is 128
> xfs_db>
>
> good? bad? indifferent? I'm thinking "bad" but we have no mechanism to
> read a batch of inodes in xfs_db other than by passing in a legit inode number.
I suppose there's the argument that if the user feeds us garbage then
they'll find out pretty quickly when the CRC checks blow up in print...
...or that it's a debugging tool so if they want to do weird things then
let them.
> And we have no mechanism to read only a /single/ inode...
>
> Maybe print a warning about the re-alignment and carry on?
Sure.
--D
>
> -Eric
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-17 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-28 0:16 [PATCH] xfs_db: properly set inode type Eric Sandeen
2017-06-28 0:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-28 0:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-06-28 22:45 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-06-28 23:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-29 4:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-17 20:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-17 21:07 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-07-18 2:20 ` Dave Chinner
2017-07-18 2:25 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-18 2:56 ` Dave Chinner
2017-07-18 1:51 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2017-07-18 21:26 ` Bill O'Donnell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170717210736.GF4224@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox