public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Tulak <jtulak@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jan Tulak <jtulak@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] mkfs: move getnum within the file
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:29:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170720092932.32580-6-jtulak@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170720092932.32580-1-jtulak@redhat.com>

Move getnum, check_opt and illegal_option within the file. We have to do
this to avoid dependency issues with the following patch. There is no
other change in this patch, just cut&paste of these functions.

Signed-off-by: Jan Tulak <jtulak@redhat.com>
---
 mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+), 118 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
index f10cb15a..9d2db2a2 100644
--- a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
+++ b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
@@ -761,6 +761,124 @@ get_conf_raw(int opt, int subopt)
 	return opts[opt].subopt_params[subopt].raw_input;
 }
 
+static __attribute__((noreturn)) void
+illegal_option(
+	const char		*value,
+	struct opt_params	*opts,
+	int			index,
+	const char		*reason)
+{
+	fprintf(stderr,
+		_("Illegal value %s for -%c %s option. %s\n"),
+		value, opts->name, opts->subopts[index],
+		reason ? reason : "");
+	usage();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check for conflicts and option respecification.
+ */
+static void
+check_opt(
+	struct opt_params	*opts,
+	int			index,
+	bool			str_seen)
+{
+	struct subopt_param	*sp = &opts->subopt_params[index];
+	int			i;
+
+	if (sp->index != index) {
+		fprintf(stderr,
+	("Developer screwed up option parsing (%d/%d)! Please report!\n"),
+			sp->index, index);
+		reqval(opts->name, (char **)opts->subopts, index);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check for respecification of the option. This is more complex than it
+	 * seems because some options are parsed twice - once as a string during
+	 * input parsing, then later the string is passed to getnum for
+	 * conversion into a number and bounds checking. Hence the two variables
+	 * used to track the different uses based on the @str parameter passed
+	 * to us.
+	 */
+	if (!str_seen) {
+		if (sp->seen)
+			respec(opts->name, (char **)opts->subopts, index);
+		sp->seen = true;
+	} else {
+		if (sp->str_seen)
+			respec(opts->name, (char **)opts->subopts, index);
+		sp->str_seen = true;
+	}
+
+	/* check for conflicts with the option */
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_CONFLICTS; i++) {
+		int conflict_opt = sp->conflicts[i];
+
+		if (conflict_opt == LAST_CONFLICT)
+			break;
+		if (opts->subopt_params[conflict_opt].seen ||
+		    opts->subopt_params[conflict_opt].str_seen)
+			conflict(opts->name, (char **)opts->subopts,
+				 conflict_opt, index);
+	}
+}
+
+static long long
+getnum(
+	const char		*str,
+	struct opt_params	*opts,
+	int			index)
+{
+	struct subopt_param	*sp = &opts->subopt_params[index];
+	long long		c;
+
+	check_opt(opts, index, false);
+	set_conf_raw(opts->index, index, str);
+	/* empty strings might just return a default value */
+	if (!str || *str == '\0') {
+		if (sp->flagval == SUBOPT_NEEDS_VAL)
+			reqval(opts->name, (char **)opts->subopts, index);
+		return sp->flagval;
+	}
+
+	if (sp->minval == 0 && sp->maxval == 0) {
+		fprintf(stderr,
+			_("Option -%c %s has undefined minval/maxval."
+			  "Can't verify value range. This is a bug.\n"),
+			opts->name, opts->subopts[index]);
+		exit(1);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Some values are pure numbers, others can have suffixes that define
+	 * the units of the number. Those get passed to cvtnum(), otherwise we
+	 * convert it ourselves to guarantee there is no trailing garbage in the
+	 * number.
+	 */
+	if (sp->convert)
+		c = cvtnum(blocksize, sectorsize, str);
+	else {
+		char		*str_end;
+
+		c = strtoll(str, &str_end, 0);
+		if (c == 0 && str_end == str)
+			illegal_option(str, opts, index, NULL);
+		if (*str_end != '\0')
+			illegal_option(str, opts, index, NULL);
+	}
+
+	/* Validity check the result. */
+	if (c < sp->minval)
+		illegal_option(str, opts, index, _("value is too small"));
+	else if (c > sp->maxval)
+		illegal_option(str, opts, index, _("value is too large"));
+	if (sp->is_power_2 && !ispow2(c))
+		illegal_option(str, opts, index, _("value must be a power of 2"));
+	return c;
+}
+
 /*
  * Convert lsu to lsunit for 512 bytes blocks and check validity of the values.
  */
@@ -1285,124 +1403,6 @@ sb_set_features(
 
 }
 
-static __attribute__((noreturn)) void
-illegal_option(
-	const char		*value,
-	struct opt_params	*opts,
-	int			index,
-	const char		*reason)
-{
-	fprintf(stderr,
-		_("Illegal value %s for -%c %s option. %s\n"),
-		value, opts->name, opts->subopts[index],
-		reason ? reason : "");
-	usage();
-}
-
-/*
- * Check for conflicts and option respecification.
- */
-static void
-check_opt(
-	struct opt_params	*opts,
-	int			index,
-	bool			str_seen)
-{
-	struct subopt_param	*sp = &opts->subopt_params[index];
-	int			i;
-
-	if (sp->index != index) {
-		fprintf(stderr,
-	("Developer screwed up option parsing (%d/%d)! Please report!\n"),
-			sp->index, index);
-		reqval(opts->name, (char **)opts->subopts, index);
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Check for respecification of the option. This is more complex than it
-	 * seems because some options are parsed twice - once as a string during
-	 * input parsing, then later the string is passed to getnum for
-	 * conversion into a number and bounds checking. Hence the two variables
-	 * used to track the different uses based on the @str parameter passed
-	 * to us.
-	 */
-	if (!str_seen) {
-		if (sp->seen)
-			respec(opts->name, (char **)opts->subopts, index);
-		sp->seen = true;
-	} else {
-		if (sp->str_seen)
-			respec(opts->name, (char **)opts->subopts, index);
-		sp->str_seen = true;
-	}
-
-	/* check for conflicts with the option */
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_CONFLICTS; i++) {
-		int conflict_opt = sp->conflicts[i];
-
-		if (conflict_opt == LAST_CONFLICT)
-			break;
-		if (opts->subopt_params[conflict_opt].seen ||
-		    opts->subopt_params[conflict_opt].str_seen)
-			conflict(opts->name, (char **)opts->subopts,
-				 conflict_opt, index);
-	}
-}
-
-static long long
-getnum(
-	const char		*str,
-	struct opt_params	*opts,
-	int			index)
-{
-	struct subopt_param	*sp = &opts->subopt_params[index];
-	long long		c;
-
-	check_opt(opts, index, false);
-	set_conf_raw(opts->index, index, str);
-	/* empty strings might just return a default value */
-	if (!str || *str == '\0') {
-		if (sp->flagval == SUBOPT_NEEDS_VAL)
-			reqval(opts->name, (char **)opts->subopts, index);
-		return sp->flagval;
-	}
-
-	if (sp->minval == 0 && sp->maxval == 0) {
-		fprintf(stderr,
-			_("Option -%c %s has undefined minval/maxval."
-			  "Can't verify value range. This is a bug.\n"),
-			opts->name, opts->subopts[index]);
-		exit(1);
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * Some values are pure numbers, others can have suffixes that define
-	 * the units of the number. Those get passed to cvtnum(), otherwise we
-	 * convert it ourselves to guarantee there is no trailing garbage in the
-	 * number.
-	 */
-	if (sp->convert)
-		c = cvtnum(blocksize, sectorsize, str);
-	else {
-		char		*str_end;
-
-		c = strtoll(str, &str_end, 0);
-		if (c == 0 && str_end == str)
-			illegal_option(str, opts, index, NULL);
-		if (*str_end != '\0')
-			illegal_option(str, opts, index, NULL);
-	}
-
-	/* Validity check the result. */
-	if (c < sp->minval)
-		illegal_option(str, opts, index, _("value is too small"));
-	else if (c > sp->maxval)
-		illegal_option(str, opts, index, _("value is too large"));
-	if (sp->is_power_2 && !ispow2(c))
-		illegal_option(str, opts, index, _("value must be a power of 2"));
-	return c;
-}
-
 /*
  * Option is a string - do all the option table work, and check there
  * is actually an option string. Otherwise we don't do anything with the string
-- 
2.11.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-20  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-20  9:29 [PATCH 0/7] mkfs: save user input into opts table Jan Tulak
2017-07-20  9:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] mkfs: Save raw user input field to the opts struct Jan Tulak
2017-07-27 16:27   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-07-28 14:45     ` Jan Tulak
2017-07-29 17:12       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-02 14:30         ` Jan Tulak
2017-08-02 15:51           ` Jan Tulak
2017-08-02 19:41             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-02 19:19           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-03 13:07             ` Jan Tulak
2017-08-03 22:25               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-04 13:50                 ` Jan Tulak
2017-08-07 17:26                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-07 17:36                     ` Jan Tulak
2017-07-20  9:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] mkfs: rename defaultval to flagval in opts Jan Tulak
2017-07-20  9:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] mkfs: remove intermediate getstr followed by getnum Jan Tulak
2017-07-20 15:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-07-21  8:56     ` Jan Tulak
2017-07-26 20:49     ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-27  7:50       ` Jan Tulak
2017-07-27 13:35         ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-21 12:24   ` [PATCH 3/7 v2] " Jan Tulak
2017-07-26 23:23     ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-20  9:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] mkfs: merge tables for opts parsing into one table Jan Tulak
2017-07-20  9:29 ` Jan Tulak [this message]
2017-07-26 23:27   ` [PATCH 5/7] mkfs: move getnum within the file Eric Sandeen
2017-07-20  9:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] mkfs: extend opt_params with a value field Jan Tulak
2017-07-27 16:18   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-07-28 14:44     ` Jan Tulak
2017-07-29 17:02       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-02 14:43         ` Jan Tulak
2017-08-02 16:57           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-02 18:11             ` Jan Tulak
2017-08-02 19:48               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-08-03 13:23                 ` Jan Tulak
2017-08-03 20:47                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-07-20  9:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] mkfs: save user input values into opts Jan Tulak
2017-07-26 23:53   ` Eric Sandeen
2017-07-27 14:21     ` Jan Tulak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170720092932.32580-6-jtulak@redhat.com \
    --to=jtulak@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox