From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:58706 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750938AbdGYNug (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:50:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:50:35 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: request for inclusion of 04197b341f23 ("xfs: don't BUG() on mixed direct and mapped I/O") Message-ID: <20170725135035.GA20865@lst.de> References: <5bcfc94b-ecb9-468b-78f3-ae5de53f62a0@suse.com> <666c5faf-cbee-f83b-90bf-279284f0600b@applied-asynchrony.com> <18dc98f7-abd8-4925-a303-7ae4c1e46db5@suse.com> <20170725134221.GB19075@kroah.com> <20170725134334.GC19075@kroah.com> <20170725134745.GA19961@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170725134745.GA19961@kroah.com> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Greg KH Cc: Nikolay Borisov , Holger =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hoffst=E4tte?= , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Brian Foster , "Darrick J. Wong" On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:47:45AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Oh, and I need an ack from the xfs maintainers to be able to take this, > there must be some reason they didn't backport it like they did for a > number of other xfs patches... In general we'd like to see xfstests runs for all stable backports, because file system code is hairy. So for any xfs stable backports please send the list of patches you want backported, and tell us that you did indeed run xfstests. No proof is required, we'd like to trust our contributors.