From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_metadump: properly handle obfuscation of all remote attribute blocks
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 08:52:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170728125201.GA12444@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7862201b-e387-8037-ca99-b6ab3212f4a7@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 03:35:37PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> add_remote_vals assumes that it can subtract blocksize
> from each block that it processes, but with CRCs, there
> is a header on each block, so the assumption that each
> block consumes $BLOCKSIZE of the value length is incorrect.
>
> This causes us to stop adding remote blocks too soon, and
> the missed blocks do not get obfuscated.
>
> Fix this by accounting for the header size as appropriate,
> depending on whether or not we have a CRC filesystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/db/metadump.c b/db/metadump.c
> index 96641e0..c8abfeb 100644
> --- a/db/metadump.c
> +++ b/db/metadump.c
> @@ -1602,14 +1602,20 @@ static struct attr_data_s {
>
> static inline void
> add_remote_vals(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> xfs_dablk_t blockidx,
> int length)
> {
> + int hdrsize = 0;
> +
> + if (xfs_sb_version_hascrc(&mp->m_sb))
> + hdrsize = sizeof(struct xfs_attr3_rmt_hdr);
> +
> while (length > 0 && attr_data.remote_val_count < MAX_REMOTE_VALS) {
> attr_data.remote_vals[attr_data.remote_val_count] = blockidx;
> attr_data.remote_val_count++;
> blockidx++;
> - length -= mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize;
> + length -= (mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize - hdrsize);
XFS_ATTR3_RMT_BUF_SPACE()?
Brian
> }
>
> if (attr_data.remote_val_count >= MAX_REMOTE_VALS) {
> @@ -1716,7 +1722,8 @@ process_attr_block(
> if (obfuscate) {
> generate_obfuscated_name(0, remote->namelen,
> &remote->name[0]);
> - add_remote_vals(be32_to_cpu(remote->valueblk),
> + add_remote_vals(mp,
> + be32_to_cpu(remote->valueblk),
> be32_to_cpu(remote->valuelen));
> }
> /* zero from end of name[] to next name start */
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-28 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 20:35 [PATCH] xfs_metadump: properly handle obfuscation of all remote attribute blocks Eric Sandeen
2017-07-28 12:52 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-08-01 16:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-08-01 16:39 ` [PATCH V2] " Eric Sandeen
2017-08-01 16:53 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170728125201.GA12444@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox