linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com, cmaiolino@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] xfs: add customizable default values for error configuration
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 10:16:37 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170824001637.GB21024@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b4f210c-4ea3-4a9d-b7ea-e60480be76e2@huawei.com>

On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 05:26:36PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> On 2017/8/22 6:50, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 07:54:19PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> XFS has the configurable error handlers for each mounted device, but
> >> the default values of these configuration are static. It will be useful
> >> to make the default values customizable when there are many XFS filesystems
> >> and we need to shutdown the filesystem after getting any error.
> > 
> > Nice! I can see the usefulness of this functionality - it's a piece
> > of the puzzle we are missing. I've had a quick look over the code,
> > and have a few high level questions that I can't answer from looking
> > at the code.
> > Was there any reason you decided to put the default policy
> > management into the kernel rather than try to provide a mechanism to
> > allow userspace to manage it (e.g. via a udev event at mount time)?
> No special reason for the kernel-side default policy, just because I didn't
> find an uevent for the mount event. If the uevent is available or added (?),
> writing an udev rule to set the default error configuration seems simpler and
> works for our scenario.

I think we'd need to add one, but given we already have a kobj for
the filesystem being mounted, it seems to me like we should be able
to add a mount notification without too much trouble via
kobject_uevent(KOBJ_ONLINE)

> > We've still got to manage per filesystem specific settings from
> > userspace (e.g.  root volume might be different to data volumes), so
> > I'm interested to know if you have any ideas on how we can handle
> > that side of the problem, too?
> Do you mean providing extra tools or files to let userspace to manage
> fs specific error settings or something else ? For us, the current sysfs
> files of error configuration are enough and there is no need for anything more.

I was thinking we should provide a generic userspace tool to catch
the XFS uevents. On a mount notification it can grab the error
config from a config file (e.g.  /etc/xfs/error.conf) and push the
config specified in that file into the sysfs error config files of
the newly mounted filesystem....

> > Assuming we are going to put default policy into the kernel, this
> > notifier structure seems overly complex when compared to a single
> > structure that holds the default values and looking it up when a
> > specific mount error config holds a flag that says "use the
> > default".
> > The "check the default flag and grab values" code could all be
> > hidden inside xfs_error_get_cfg() so propagation happens on demand.
> > This means all the mounts pick up changes to the default config
> > without needing to be chained to a notifier.
> > 
> > The "use defaults" flag could be cleared when a new value is set for
> > that error config, and potentionally we could reset it in the store
> > method if it matches the current default value.
> > 
> > I might be missing something here (I frequently do, so please tell
> > me if I have!), but my initial thoughts are that we can do this in a
> > much simpler manner. What do you think, Tao?
>
> Yes, I agree that the notifier method is over-weighted, and the proposed method
> is much better. However it has no way to reset the "use default flag" of a specific
> configuration when the modified default value is modified again to a new value when
> the old default value is equal with the current specific value. Maybe the reset is
> unnecessary ?

In that case I think the reset is unnecessary. The fact the default
was changed to match a specific filesystem config doesn't mean that
filesystem should start using the defaults. i.e. if you want to
reset the filesystem to default config, then you need to rewrite
it's config to match the current defaults.

It's a bit clunky, but it's a simple rule that's easy to understand
and it keeps the API and both the kernel and userspace code really
simple.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-24  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-21 11:54 [PATCH RFC 0/3] xfs: add customizable default values for error configuration Hou Tao
2017-08-21 11:54 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] xfs: prepare for the customizable default values of " Hou Tao
2017-08-21 11:54 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] xfs: add sysfs files for " Hou Tao
2017-08-21 11:54 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] xfs: make the default values of error configuration customizable and workable Hou Tao
2017-08-21 22:50 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] xfs: add customizable default values for error configuration Dave Chinner
2017-08-22 16:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-23 10:29     ` Hou Tao
2017-08-23  9:26   ` Hou Tao
2017-08-24  0:16     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2017-08-24  0:46       ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-24  1:00         ` Dave Chinner
2017-08-24  1:42           ` Hou Tao
2017-08-24  2:06             ` Dave Chinner
2017-08-22  4:05 ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170824001637.GB21024@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).