From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: refactor buffer logging into buffer dirtying helper
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:05:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170825150557.43010-5-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170825150557.43010-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
xfs_trans_log_buf() is responsible for logging the dirty segments of
a buffer along with setting all of the necessary state on the
transaction, buffer, bli, etc., to ensure that the associated items
are marked as dirty and prepared for I/O. We have a couple use cases
that need to to dirty a buffer in a transaction without actually
logging dirty ranges of the buffer. One existing use case is
ordered buffers, which are currently logged with arbitrary ranges to
accomplish this even though the content of ordered buffers is never
written to the log. Another pending use case is to relog an already
dirty buffer across rolled transactions within the deferred
operations infrastructure. This is required to prevent a held
(XFS_BLI_HOLD) buffer from pinning the tail of the log.
Refactor xfs_trans_log_buf() into a new function that contains all
of the logic responsible to dirty the transaction, lidp, buffer and
bli. This new function can be used in the future for the use cases
outlined above. This patch does not introduce functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h | 4 +++-
fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
index 7d62772..b3632eb 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
@@ -217,7 +217,9 @@ void xfs_trans_dquot_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *, uint);
void xfs_trans_inode_alloc_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
void xfs_trans_ichgtime(struct xfs_trans *, struct xfs_inode *, int);
void xfs_trans_ijoin(struct xfs_trans *, struct xfs_inode *, uint);
-void xfs_trans_log_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *, uint, uint);
+void xfs_trans_log_buf(struct xfs_trans *, struct xfs_buf *, uint,
+ uint);
+void xfs_trans_dirty_buf(struct xfs_trans *, struct xfs_buf *);
void xfs_trans_log_inode(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_inode *, uint);
void xfs_extent_free_init_defer_op(void);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
index cac8abb..8c99813 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
@@ -493,25 +493,17 @@ xfs_trans_bhold_release(xfs_trans_t *tp,
}
/*
- * This is called to mark bytes first through last inclusive of the given
- * buffer as needing to be logged when the transaction is committed.
- * The buffer must already be associated with the given transaction.
- *
- * First and last are numbers relative to the beginning of this buffer,
- * so the first byte in the buffer is numbered 0 regardless of the
- * value of b_blkno.
+ * Mark a buffer dirty in the transaction.
*/
void
-xfs_trans_log_buf(xfs_trans_t *tp,
- xfs_buf_t *bp,
- uint first,
- uint last)
+xfs_trans_dirty_buf(
+ struct xfs_trans *tp,
+ struct xfs_buf *bp)
{
- xfs_buf_log_item_t *bip = bp->b_fspriv;
+ struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_fspriv;
ASSERT(bp->b_transp == tp);
ASSERT(bip != NULL);
- ASSERT(first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length));
ASSERT(bp->b_iodone == NULL ||
bp->b_iodone == xfs_buf_iodone_callbacks);
@@ -531,8 +523,6 @@ xfs_trans_log_buf(xfs_trans_t *tp,
bp->b_iodone = xfs_buf_iodone_callbacks;
bip->bli_item.li_cb = xfs_buf_iodone;
- trace_xfs_trans_log_buf(bip);
-
/*
* If we invalidated the buffer within this transaction, then
* cancel the invalidation now that we're dirtying the buffer
@@ -545,15 +535,39 @@ xfs_trans_log_buf(xfs_trans_t *tp,
bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_STALE;
bip->__bli_format.blf_flags &= ~XFS_BLF_CANCEL;
}
+ bip->bli_flags |= XFS_BLI_DIRTY | XFS_BLI_LOGGED;
tp->t_flags |= XFS_TRANS_DIRTY;
bip->bli_item.li_desc->lid_flags |= XFS_LID_DIRTY;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This is called to mark bytes first through last inclusive of the given
+ * buffer as needing to be logged when the transaction is committed.
+ * The buffer must already be associated with the given transaction.
+ *
+ * First and last are numbers relative to the beginning of this buffer,
+ * so the first byte in the buffer is numbered 0 regardless of the
+ * value of b_blkno.
+ */
+void
+xfs_trans_log_buf(
+ struct xfs_trans *tp,
+ struct xfs_buf *bp,
+ uint first,
+ uint last)
+{
+ struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_fspriv;
+
+ ASSERT(first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length));
+
+ xfs_trans_dirty_buf(tp, bp);
/*
* If we have an ordered buffer we are not logging any dirty range but
* it still needs to be marked dirty and that it has been logged.
*/
- bip->bli_flags |= XFS_BLI_DIRTY | XFS_BLI_LOGGED;
+ trace_xfs_trans_log_buf(bip);
if (!(bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_ORDERED))
xfs_buf_item_log(bip, first, last);
}
--
2.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-25 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-25 15:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs: xfs: refactor ordered buffer logging code Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: open-code xfs_buf_item_dirty() Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: remove unnecessary dirty bli format check for ordered bufs Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-28 10:51 ` Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: ordered buffer log items are never formatted Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-08-28 9:28 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: refactor buffer logging into buffer dirtying helper Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: don't log dirty ranges for ordered buffers Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: skip bmbt block ino validation during owner change Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-25 18:11 ` Brian Foster
2017-08-28 9:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: move bmbt owner change to last step of extent swap Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: disallow marking previously dirty buffers as ordered Brian Foster
2017-08-25 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: relog dirty buffers during swapext bmbt owner change Brian Foster
2017-08-25 16:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170825150557.43010-5-bfoster@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).