linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] xfs: don't log dirty ranges for ordered buffers
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 11:05:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170825150557.43010-6-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170825150557.43010-1-bfoster@redhat.com>

Ordered buffers are attached to transactions and pushed through the
logging infrastructure just like normal buffers with the exception
that they are not actually written to the log. Therefore, we don't
need to log dirty ranges of ordered buffers. xfs_trans_log_buf() is
called on ordered buffers to set up all of the dirty state on the
transaction, buffer and log item and prepare the buffer for I/O.

Now that xfs_trans_dirty_buf() is available, call it from
xfs_trans_ordered_buf() so the latter is now mutually exclusive with
xfs_trans_log_buf(). This reflects the implementation of ordered
buffers and helps eliminate confusion over the need to log ranges of
ordered buffers just to set up internal log state.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c  |  6 ++----
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c |  2 --
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c     | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
index e0bcc4a..0b7905a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
@@ -4464,12 +4464,10 @@ xfs_btree_block_change_owner(
 	 * though, so everything is consistent in memory.
 	 */
 	if (bp) {
-		if (cur->bc_tp) {
+		if (cur->bc_tp)
 			xfs_trans_ordered_buf(cur->bc_tp, bp);
-			xfs_btree_log_block(cur, bp, XFS_BB_OWNER);
-		} else {
+		else
 			xfs_buf_delwri_queue(bp, bbcoi->buffer_list);
-		}
 	} else {
 		ASSERT(cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_ROOT_IN_INODE);
 		ASSERT(level == cur->bc_nlevels - 1);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
index 1e0658a..988bb3f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
@@ -378,8 +378,6 @@ xfs_ialloc_inode_init(
 				 * transaction and pin the log appropriately.
 				 */
 				xfs_trans_ordered_buf(tp, fbuf);
-				xfs_trans_log_buf(tp, fbuf, 0,
-						  BBTOB(fbuf->b_length) - 1);
 			}
 		} else {
 			fbuf->b_flags |= XBF_DONE;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
index 8c99813..3089e80 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
@@ -560,16 +560,12 @@ xfs_trans_log_buf(
 	struct xfs_buf_log_item	*bip = bp->b_fspriv;
 
 	ASSERT(first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length));
+	ASSERT(!(bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_ORDERED));
 
 	xfs_trans_dirty_buf(tp, bp);
 
-	/*
-	 * If we have an ordered buffer we are not logging any dirty range but
-	 * it still needs to be marked dirty and that it has been logged.
-	 */
 	trace_xfs_trans_log_buf(bip);
-	if (!(bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_ORDERED))
-		xfs_buf_item_log(bip, first, last);
+	xfs_buf_item_log(bip, first, last);
 }
 
 
@@ -722,12 +718,11 @@ xfs_trans_inode_alloc_buf(
 }
 
 /*
- * Mark the buffer as ordered for this transaction. This means
- * that the contents of the buffer are not recorded in the transaction
- * but it is tracked in the AIL as though it was. This allows us
- * to record logical changes in transactions rather than the physical
- * changes we make to the buffer without changing writeback ordering
- * constraints of metadata buffers.
+ * Mark the buffer as ordered for this transaction. This means that the contents
+ * of the buffer are not recorded in the transaction but it is tracked in the
+ * AIL as though it was. This allows us to record logical changes in
+ * transactions rather than the physical changes we make to the buffer without
+ * changing writeback ordering constraints of metadata buffers.
  */
 void
 xfs_trans_ordered_buf(
@@ -739,9 +734,16 @@ xfs_trans_ordered_buf(
 	ASSERT(bp->b_transp == tp);
 	ASSERT(bip != NULL);
 	ASSERT(atomic_read(&bip->bli_refcount) > 0);
+	ASSERT(!xfs_buf_item_dirty_format(bip));
 
 	bip->bli_flags |= XFS_BLI_ORDERED;
 	trace_xfs_buf_item_ordered(bip);
+
+	/*
+	 * We don't log a dirty range of an ordered buffer but it still needs
+	 * to be marked dirty and that it has been logged.
+	 */
+	xfs_trans_dirty_buf(tp, bp);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-25 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-25 15:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs: xfs: refactor ordered buffer logging code Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: open-code xfs_buf_item_dirty() Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28  9:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: remove unnecessary dirty bli format check for ordered bufs Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:51   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28  9:25   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-28 10:51     ` Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: ordered buffer log items are never formatted Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28  9:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: refactor buffer logging into buffer dirtying helper Brian Foster
2017-08-28  9:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-08-25 15:51   ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: don't log dirty ranges for ordered buffers Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28  9:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: skip bmbt block ino validation during owner change Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:35   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-25 18:11     ` Brian Foster
2017-08-28  9:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: move bmbt owner change to last step of extent swap Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:57   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28  9:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: disallow marking previously dirty buffers as ordered Brian Foster
2017-08-25 16:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28  9:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: relog dirty buffers during swapext bmbt owner change Brian Foster
2017-08-25 16:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28  9:51   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170825150557.43010-6-bfoster@redhat.com \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).