From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] xfs: ordered buffer log items are never formatted
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 08:26:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170825152605.GK4796@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170825150557.43010-4-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:05:51AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Ordered buffers pass through the logging infrastructure without ever
> being written to the log. The way this works is that the ordered
> buffer status is transferred to the log vector at commit time via
> the ->iop_size() callback. In xlog_cil_insert_format_items(),
> ordered log vectors bypass ->iop_format() processing altogether.
>
> Therefore it is unnecessary for xfs_buf_item_format() to handle
> ordered buffers. Remove the unnecessary logic and assert that an
> ordered buffer never reaches this point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 12 ++----------
> fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> index 9f4dbca..4df4581 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c
> @@ -323,6 +323,8 @@ xfs_buf_item_format(
> ASSERT((bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE) ||
> (xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) > XFS_BLFT_UNKNOWN_BUF
> && xfs_blft_from_flags(&bip->__bli_format) < XFS_BLFT_MAX_BUF));
> + ASSERT(!(bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_ORDERED) ||
> + bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_STALE);
Needs parentheses around the stale check.
--D
>
>
> /*
> @@ -347,16 +349,6 @@ xfs_buf_item_format(
> bip->bli_flags &= ~XFS_BLI_INODE_BUF;
> }
>
> - if ((bip->bli_flags & (XFS_BLI_ORDERED|XFS_BLI_STALE)) ==
> - XFS_BLI_ORDERED) {
> - /*
> - * The buffer has been logged just to order it. It is not being
> - * included in the transaction commit, so don't format it.
> - */
> - trace_xfs_buf_item_format_ordered(bip);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> for (i = 0; i < bip->bli_format_count; i++) {
> xfs_buf_item_format_segment(bip, lv, &vecp, offset,
> &bip->bli_formats[i]);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> index 6881047..e839ab4 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> @@ -517,7 +517,6 @@ DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_size);
> DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_size_ordered);
> DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_size_stale);
> DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_format);
> -DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_format_ordered);
> DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_format_stale);
> DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_ordered);
> DEFINE_BUF_ITEM_EVENT(xfs_buf_item_pin);
> --
> 2.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-25 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-25 15:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs: xfs: refactor ordered buffer logging code Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: open-code xfs_buf_item_dirty() Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: remove unnecessary dirty bli format check for ordered bufs Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-28 10:51 ` Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: ordered buffer log items are never formatted Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:26 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-08-28 9:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: refactor buffer logging into buffer dirtying helper Brian Foster
2017-08-28 9:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: don't log dirty ranges for ordered buffers Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: skip bmbt block ino validation during owner change Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-25 18:11 ` Brian Foster
2017-08-28 9:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: move bmbt owner change to last step of extent swap Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: disallow marking previously dirty buffers as ordered Brian Foster
2017-08-25 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: relog dirty buffers during swapext bmbt owner change Brian Foster
2017-08-25 16:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170825152605.GK4796@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).