From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] xfs: disallow marking previously dirty buffers as ordered
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:50:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170825165032.GQ4796@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170825150557.43010-9-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:05:56AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> Ordered buffers are used in situations where the buffer is not
> physically logged but must pass through the transaction/logging
> pipeline for a particular transaction. As a result, ordered buffers
> are not unpinned and written back until the transaction commits to
> the log. Ordered buffers have a strict requirement that the target
> buffer must not be currently dirty and resident in the log pipeline
> at the time it is marked ordered. If a dirty+ordered buffer is
> committed, the buffer is reinserted to the AIL but not physically
> relogged at the LSN of the associated checkpoint. The buffer log
> item is assigned the LSN of the latest checkpoint and the AIL
> effectively releases the previously logged buffer content from the
> active log before the buffer has been written back. If the tail
> pushes forward and a filesystem crash occurs while in this state, an
> inconsistent filesystem could result.
>
> It is currently the caller responsibility to ensure an ordered
> buffer is not already dirty from a previous modification. This is
> unclear and error prone when not used in situations where it is
> guaranteed a buffer has not been previously modified (such as new
> metadata allocations).
>
> To facilitate general purpose use of ordered buffers, update
> xfs_trans_ordered_buf() to conditionally order the buffer based on
> state of the log item and return the status of the result. If the
> bli is dirty, do not order the buffer and return false. The caller
> must either physically log the buffer (having acquired the
> appropriate log reservation) or push it from the AIL to clean it
> before it can be marked ordered in the current transaction.
>
> Note that ordered buffers are currently only used in two situations:
> 1.) inode chunk allocation where previously logged buffers are not
> possible and 2.) extent swap which will be updated to handle ordered
> buffer failures in a separate patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 7 +++++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> index b3632eb..4709823 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.h
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ void xfs_trans_bhold_release(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
> void xfs_trans_binval(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
> void xfs_trans_inode_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
> void xfs_trans_stale_inode_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
> -void xfs_trans_ordered_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
> +bool xfs_trans_ordered_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
> void xfs_trans_dquot_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *, uint);
> void xfs_trans_inode_alloc_buf(xfs_trans_t *, struct xfs_buf *);
> void xfs_trans_ichgtime(struct xfs_trans *, struct xfs_inode *, int);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> index 3089e80..3ba7a96 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
> @@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ xfs_trans_inode_alloc_buf(
> * transactions rather than the physical changes we make to the buffer without
> * changing writeback ordering constraints of metadata buffers.
> */
> -void
> +bool
> xfs_trans_ordered_buf(
> struct xfs_trans *tp,
> struct xfs_buf *bp)
> @@ -734,7 +734,9 @@ xfs_trans_ordered_buf(
> ASSERT(bp->b_transp == tp);
> ASSERT(bip != NULL);
> ASSERT(atomic_read(&bip->bli_refcount) > 0);
> - ASSERT(!xfs_buf_item_dirty_format(bip));
> +
> + if (xfs_buf_item_dirty_format(bip))
> + return false;
>
> bip->bli_flags |= XFS_BLI_ORDERED;
> trace_xfs_buf_item_ordered(bip);
> @@ -744,6 +746,7 @@ xfs_trans_ordered_buf(
> * to be marked dirty and that it has been logged.
> */
> xfs_trans_dirty_buf(tp, bp);
> + return true;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-25 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-25 15:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs: xfs: refactor ordered buffer logging code Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: open-code xfs_buf_item_dirty() Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: remove unnecessary dirty bli format check for ordered bufs Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-28 10:51 ` Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: ordered buffer log items are never formatted Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: refactor buffer logging into buffer dirtying helper Brian Foster
2017-08-28 9:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: don't log dirty ranges for ordered buffers Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: skip bmbt block ino validation during owner change Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-25 18:11 ` Brian Foster
2017-08-28 9:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: move bmbt owner change to last step of extent swap Brian Foster
2017-08-25 15:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: disallow marking previously dirty buffers as ordered Brian Foster
2017-08-25 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-08-28 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:05 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: relog dirty buffers during swapext bmbt owner change Brian Foster
2017-08-25 16:53 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-08-28 9:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170825165032.GQ4796@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).