From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:49969 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751405AbdH3QWf (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:22:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:22:05 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't set DAX flag for v2 inodes Message-ID: <20170830162205.GO4757@magnolia> References: <20170830155517.GI4757@magnolia> <20170830161500.GA1755@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170830161500.GA1755@infradead.org> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs , Jan Kara On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:15:00AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > How about returning an error from xfs_set_diflags for > anything that would go into di_flags2 for v2 inodes? I had also thought about refactoring all those xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags validity checks into a single separate checking function, how about that? --D > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html