linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	fstests@vger.kernel.org, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: add regression test for DAX mount option usage
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:38:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170912153820.GA5000@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170912064411.GR10621@dastard>

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 04:44:11PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 03:21:53PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > This adds a regression test for the following kernel patch:
> > 
> >   xfs: always use DAX if mount option is used
> > 
> > This test will also pass with kernel v4.14-rc1 and beyond because the XFS
> > DAX I/O mount option has been disabled (but not removed), so the
> > "chattr -x" to turn off DAX doesn't actually do anything.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
> > Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> .....
> > +pgsize=`$here/src/feature -s`
> > +
> > +# disable tracing, clear the existing trace buffer and turn on dax tracepoints
> > +echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on
> > +echo > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
> > +echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/fs_dax/enable
> > +
> > +# enable tracing for our one mmap I/O, then see if dax was used
> > +echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on
> > +xfs_io  -t -c "truncate $pgsize" \
> > +	-c "chattr -x" \
> > +	-c "mmap -r 0 $pgsize" -c "mread 0 $pgsize" -c "munmap" \
> > +	-f $SCRATCH_MNT/testfile >> $seqres.full
> > +echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/tracing_on
> 
> So what happens when the user is already tracing the test to
> find a bug and the test turns all their tracing off?
> 
> Regardless of this screwing up developer bug triage, do we really
> want to add a dependency on kernel tracing into the test harness?

Yep, these are both valid concerns.  I ended up trying to get around both of
them by using perf instead in my v2, as suggested by Dan:

https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg10420.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-12 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-07 21:08 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: some DAX fixes Ross Zwisler
2017-09-07 21:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: always use DAX if mount option is used Ross Zwisler
2017-09-08  7:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-08 15:28     ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-08 21:21       ` [PATCH] xfs: add regression test for DAX mount option usage Ross Zwisler
2017-09-11 15:16         ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-11 15:37           ` Dan Williams
2017-09-11 20:01             ` [fstests PATCH v2] " Ross Zwisler
2017-09-14  6:57               ` Eryu Guan
2017-09-15 22:42                 ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-16 22:26                   ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-12  6:44         ` [PATCH] " Dave Chinner
2017-09-12 15:38           ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2017-09-12 23:47             ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-13 14:42               ` Ross Zwisler
2017-09-13 22:01                 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-13 22:23                   ` Dan Williams
2017-09-13 23:34                     ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-14  0:28                       ` Dan Williams
2017-09-14  0:40                         ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-14  1:24                           ` Dan Williams
2017-09-14 12:19                             ` Jeff Moyer
2017-09-14 13:16                               ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-09-14 14:10                                 ` Dan Williams
2017-09-15  9:18                                   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-09-15 17:39                                     ` Dan Williams
2017-09-18  7:47                                       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-09-07 21:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: validate bdev support for DAX inode flag Ross Zwisler
2017-09-08  7:21   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170912153820.GA5000@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).