From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 16/25] xfs: don't log dirty ranges for ordered buffers
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 14:06:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170917210631.10725-17-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170917210631.10725-1-hch@lst.de>
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
commit 8dc518dfa7dbd079581269e51074b3c55a65a880 upstream.
Ordered buffers are attached to transactions and pushed through the
logging infrastructure just like normal buffers with the exception
that they are not actually written to the log. Therefore, we don't
need to log dirty ranges of ordered buffers. xfs_trans_log_buf() is
called on ordered buffers to set up all of the dirty state on the
transaction, buffer and log item and prepare the buffer for I/O.
Now that xfs_trans_dirty_buf() is available, call it from
xfs_trans_ordered_buf() so the latter is now mutually exclusive with
xfs_trans_log_buf(). This reflects the implementation of ordered
buffers and helps eliminate confusion over the need to log ranges of
ordered buffers just to set up internal log state.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 6 ++----
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c | 2 --
fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
index e0bcc4a59efd..0b7905a4e27a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
@@ -4464,12 +4464,10 @@ xfs_btree_block_change_owner(
* though, so everything is consistent in memory.
*/
if (bp) {
- if (cur->bc_tp) {
+ if (cur->bc_tp)
xfs_trans_ordered_buf(cur->bc_tp, bp);
- xfs_btree_log_block(cur, bp, XFS_BB_OWNER);
- } else {
+ else
xfs_buf_delwri_queue(bp, bbcoi->buffer_list);
- }
} else {
ASSERT(cur->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_ROOT_IN_INODE);
ASSERT(level == cur->bc_nlevels - 1);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
index 1e0658a3f155..988bb3f31446 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ialloc.c
@@ -378,8 +378,6 @@ xfs_ialloc_inode_init(
* transaction and pin the log appropriately.
*/
xfs_trans_ordered_buf(tp, fbuf);
- xfs_trans_log_buf(tp, fbuf, 0,
- BBTOB(fbuf->b_length) - 1);
}
} else {
fbuf->b_flags |= XBF_DONE;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
index 8c99813e5377..3089e8015369 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans_buf.c
@@ -560,16 +560,12 @@ xfs_trans_log_buf(
struct xfs_buf_log_item *bip = bp->b_fspriv;
ASSERT(first <= last && last < BBTOB(bp->b_length));
+ ASSERT(!(bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_ORDERED));
xfs_trans_dirty_buf(tp, bp);
- /*
- * If we have an ordered buffer we are not logging any dirty range but
- * it still needs to be marked dirty and that it has been logged.
- */
trace_xfs_trans_log_buf(bip);
- if (!(bip->bli_flags & XFS_BLI_ORDERED))
- xfs_buf_item_log(bip, first, last);
+ xfs_buf_item_log(bip, first, last);
}
@@ -722,12 +718,11 @@ xfs_trans_inode_alloc_buf(
}
/*
- * Mark the buffer as ordered for this transaction. This means
- * that the contents of the buffer are not recorded in the transaction
- * but it is tracked in the AIL as though it was. This allows us
- * to record logical changes in transactions rather than the physical
- * changes we make to the buffer without changing writeback ordering
- * constraints of metadata buffers.
+ * Mark the buffer as ordered for this transaction. This means that the contents
+ * of the buffer are not recorded in the transaction but it is tracked in the
+ * AIL as though it was. This allows us to record logical changes in
+ * transactions rather than the physical changes we make to the buffer without
+ * changing writeback ordering constraints of metadata buffers.
*/
void
xfs_trans_ordered_buf(
@@ -739,9 +734,16 @@ xfs_trans_ordered_buf(
ASSERT(bp->b_transp == tp);
ASSERT(bip != NULL);
ASSERT(atomic_read(&bip->bli_refcount) > 0);
+ ASSERT(!xfs_buf_item_dirty_format(bip));
bip->bli_flags |= XFS_BLI_ORDERED;
trace_xfs_buf_item_ordered(bip);
+
+ /*
+ * We don't log a dirty range of an ordered buffer but it still needs
+ * to be marked dirty and that it has been logged.
+ */
+ xfs_trans_dirty_buf(tp, bp);
}
/*
--
2.14.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-17 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-17 21:06 4.13-stable updates for XFS Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 01/25] xfs: write unmount record for ro mounts Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 02/25] xfs: toggle readonly state around xfs_log_mount_finish Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 03/25] xfs: Add infrastructure needed for error propagation during buffer IO failure Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 04/25] xfs: Properly retry failed inode items in case of error during buffer writeback Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 05/25] xfs: fix recovery failure when log record header wraps log end Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 06/25] xfs: always verify the log tail during recovery Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 07/25] xfs: fix log recovery corruption error due to tail overwrite Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 08/25] xfs: handle -EFSCORRUPTED during head/tail verification Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 09/25] xfs: stop searching for free slots in an inode chunk when there are none Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 10/25] xfs: evict all inodes involved with log redo item Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 11/25] xfs: check for race with xfs_reclaim_inode() in xfs_ifree_cluster() Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 12/25] xfs: open-code xfs_buf_item_dirty() Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 13/25] xfs: remove unnecessary dirty bli format check for ordered bufs Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 14/25] xfs: ordered buffer log items are never formatted Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 15/25] xfs: refactor buffer logging into buffer dirtying helper Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 17/25] xfs: skip bmbt block ino validation during owner change Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 18/25] xfs: move bmbt owner change to last step of extent swap Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 19/25] xfs: disallow marking previously dirty buffers as ordered Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 20/25] xfs: relog dirty buffers during swapext bmbt owner change Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 21/25] xfs: disable per-inode DAX flag Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 22/25] xfs: fix incorrect log_flushed on fsync Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 23/25] xfs: don't set v3 xflags for v2 inodes Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 24/25] xfs: open code end_buffer_async_write in xfs_finish_page_writeback Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-17 21:06 ` [PATCH 25/25] xfs: use kmem_free to free return value of kmem_zalloc Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-18 8:31 ` 4.13-stable updates for XFS Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170917210631.10725-17-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).