From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:58105 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751878AbdIQVHN (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Sep 2017 17:07:13 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: [PATCH 02/47] xfs: fix spurious spin_is_locked() assert failures on non-smp kernels Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 14:06:27 -0700 Message-Id: <20170917210712.10804-3-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20170917210712.10804-1-hch@lst.de> References: <20170917210712.10804-1-hch@lst.de> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Brian Foster , "Darrick J . Wong" From: Brian Foster commit 95989c46d2a156365867b1d795fdefce71bce378 upstream. The 0-day kernel test robot reports assertion failures on !CONFIG_SMP kernels due to failed spin_is_locked() checks. As it turns out, spin_is_locked() is hardcoded to return zero on !CONFIG_SMP kernels and so this function cannot be relied on to verify spinlock state in this configuration. To avoid this problem, replace the associated asserts with lockdep variants that do the right thing regardless of kernel configuration. Drop the one assert that checks for an unlocked lock as there is no suitable lockdep variant for that case. This moves the spinlock checks from XFS debug code to lockdep, but generally provides the same level of protection. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Brian Foster Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong --- fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 5 ++--- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c index 16269271ebd6..24940dd3baa8 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static inline void __xfs_buf_ioacct_dec( struct xfs_buf *bp) { - ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&bp->b_lock)); + lockdep_assert_held(&bp->b_lock); if (bp->b_state & XFS_BSTATE_IN_FLIGHT) { bp->b_state &= ~XFS_BSTATE_IN_FLIGHT; diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c index 74304b6ce84b..e279882de427 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ xfs_inode_alloc( XFS_STATS_INC(mp, vn_active); ASSERT(atomic_read(&ip->i_pincount) == 0); - ASSERT(!spin_is_locked(&ip->i_flags_lock)); ASSERT(!xfs_isiflocked(ip)); ASSERT(ip->i_ino == 0); @@ -192,7 +191,7 @@ xfs_perag_set_reclaim_tag( { struct xfs_mount *mp = pag->pag_mount; - ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pag->pag_ici_lock)); + lockdep_assert_held(&pag->pag_ici_lock); if (pag->pag_ici_reclaimable++) return; @@ -214,7 +213,7 @@ xfs_perag_clear_reclaim_tag( { struct xfs_mount *mp = pag->pag_mount; - ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&pag->pag_ici_lock)); + lockdep_assert_held(&pag->pag_ici_lock); if (--pag->pag_ici_reclaimable) return; -- 2.14.1