From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
bfoster@redhat.com, sandeen@redhat.com, dchinner@redhat.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xfs: Uninitialized memory read at xlog_write
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:46:39 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170920004639.GO10621@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170918182121.GI6540@magnolia>
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:21:21AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 08:44:31AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > xfs: Don't log uninitialised fields in inode structures
> >
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> >
> > Prevent kmemcheck from throwing warnings about reading uninitialised
> > memory when formatting inodes into the incore log buffer. There are
> > several issues here - we don't always log all the fields in the
> > inode log format item, and we never log the inode the
> > di_next_unlinked field.
> >
> > In the case of the inode log format item, this is aused b cerbated
>
> "is aused b cerbated" ?
vi fail when replacing the word "used" with "exacerbated". :)
> > by the old xfs_inode_log_format structure padding issue. Hence make
> > the padded, 64 bit aligned version of the structure the one we always
> > use for formatting the log and get rid of the 64 bit variant. This
> > means we'll always log the 64-bit version and so recovery only needs
> > to convert from the unpadded 32 bit version from older 32 bit
> > kernels.
>
> And those old 32-bit kernels can read the xfs_inode_log_format{,_64}
> structures, right?
Yes. With the in-memory format now being the same as the old
xfs_inode_log_format_64 structure in the log, we only need a
conversion from "32 bit in log to 64 bit in memory" on all
platforms.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-20 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-04 12:19 xfs: Uninitialized memory read at xlog_write Tetsuo Handa
2017-09-04 17:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-04 21:44 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-09-11 15:01 ` Brian Foster
2017-09-13 7:14 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-09-13 9:43 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-13 9:59 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-09-13 21:40 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-14 10:15 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-09-14 22:44 ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-15 11:19 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-09-18 18:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-20 0:46 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2017-09-20 0:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170920004639.GO10621@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).