From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: update i_size after unwritten conversion in dio completion
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 08:07:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170921120709.GA58956@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170921103828.18690-1-eguan@redhat.com>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 06:38:28PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> Since commit d531d91d6990 ("xfs: always use unwritten extents for
> direct I/O writes"), we start allocating unwritten extents for all
> direct writes to allow appending aio in XFS.
>
> But for dio writes that could extend file size we update the in-core
> inode size first, then convert the unwritten extents to real
> allocations at dio completion time in xfs_dio_write_end_io(). Thus a
> racing direct read could see the new i_size and find the unwritten
> extents first and read zeros instead of actual data, if the direct
> writer also takes a shared iolock.
>
> Fix it by updating the in-core inode size after the unwritten extent
> conversion. To do this, introduce a new boolean argument to
> xfs_iomap_write_unwritten() to tell if we want to update in-core
> i_size or not.
>
> Suggested-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Patch passed the test posted by Eric[1] and a locally modified aio
> version of the test.
>
> I also ran fstests with config xfs_4k_crc, xfs_2k_reflink, xfs_1k_rmap
> and xfs_512, and aio-dio tests from ltp, I don't see any new failures
> introduced.
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/fstests/msg06978.html
>
Looks pretty good, just a few comment/whitespace nits...
> fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 9 ++++++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 7 ++++++-
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.h | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index 29172609f2a3..f937968e9515 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -343,7 +343,14 @@ xfs_end_io(
> error = xfs_reflink_end_cow(ip, offset, size);
> break;
> case XFS_IO_UNWRITTEN:
> - error = xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(ip, offset, size);
> + /*
> + * The correct in-core inode size should have been updated by
> + * generic_write_end, and the 'size' here is buffer head
> + * granularity size of the ioend, which could be larger than
> + * the actual bytes written. So skip in-core i_size update in
> + * xfs_iomap_write_unwritten()
> + */
The more I think about this, the less applicable the granularity seems
to be (sorry :P). It seems rather broken if writeback were to affect
isize in general. Perhaps just the following?
/* writeback should never update isize */
> + error = xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(ip, offset, size, false);
> break;
> default:
> ASSERT(!xfs_ioend_is_append(ioend) || ioend->io_append_trans);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 350b6d43ba23..d4796c5a88fe 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,6 @@ xfs_dio_write_end_io(
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
> struct xfs_inode *ip = XFS_I(inode);
> loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
> - bool update_size = false;
> int error = 0;
>
> trace_xfs_end_io_direct_write(ip, offset, size);
> @@ -445,6 +444,22 @@ xfs_dio_write_end_io(
> if (size <= 0)
> return size;
>
> + if (flags & IOMAP_DIO_COW) {
> + error = xfs_reflink_end_cow(ip, offset, size);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Deal with IOMAP_DIO_UNWRITTEN case before check & update in-core
> + * inode size, we do it only after converting the unwritten extents to
> + * real allocations in xfs_iomap_write_write_unwritten() (by passing
> + * 'true' as the last argument to it), otherwise a racing direct read
> + * could see the new size thus read zeros because of unwritten extents.
> + */
/*
* Unwritten conversion updates the in-core isize after extent
* conversion but before updating the on-disk size. Updating isize any
* earlier allows a racing dio read to find unwritten extents before
* they are converted.
*/
> + if (flags & IOMAP_DIO_UNWRITTEN)
> + return xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(ip, offset, size, true);
> +
> /*
> * We need to update the in-core inode size here so that we don't end up
> * with the on-disk inode size being outside the in-core inode size. We
> @@ -459,20 +474,11 @@ xfs_dio_write_end_io(
> spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
> if (offset + size > i_size_read(inode)) {
> i_size_write(inode, offset + size);
> - update_size = true;
> - }
> - spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
> -
> - if (flags & IOMAP_DIO_COW) {
> - error = xfs_reflink_end_cow(ip, offset, size);
> - if (error)
> - return error;
> - }
> -
> - if (flags & IOMAP_DIO_UNWRITTEN)
> - error = xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(ip, offset, size);
> - else if (update_size)
> + spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
> error = xfs_setfilesize(ip, offset, size);
> + } else {
> + spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
> + }
>
> return error;
> }
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index a1909bc064e9..90dc551a8621 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -829,7 +829,8 @@ int
> xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(
> xfs_inode_t *ip,
> xfs_off_t offset,
> - xfs_off_t count)
> + xfs_off_t count,
> + bool update_isize)
> {
> xfs_mount_t *mp = ip->i_mount;
> xfs_fileoff_t offset_fsb;
> @@ -840,6 +841,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(
> xfs_trans_t *tp;
> xfs_bmbt_irec_t imap;
> struct xfs_defer_ops dfops;
> + struct inode *inode = VFS_I(ip);
> xfs_fsize_t i_size;
> uint resblks;
> int error;
> @@ -900,6 +902,9 @@ xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(
> if (i_size > offset + count)
> i_size = offset + count;
>
> + if (update_isize && (i_size > i_size_read(inode)))
> + i_size_write(inode, i_size);
> +
We could probably kill the blank lines around the above hunk.
With those minor fixups:
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Thanks for taking care of this!
> i_size = xfs_new_eof(ip, i_size);
> if (i_size) {
> ip->i_d.di_size = i_size;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.h
> index 00db3ecea084..ee535065c5d0 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ int xfs_iomap_write_direct(struct xfs_inode *, xfs_off_t, size_t,
> struct xfs_bmbt_irec *, int);
> int xfs_iomap_write_allocate(struct xfs_inode *, int, xfs_off_t,
> struct xfs_bmbt_irec *);
> -int xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(struct xfs_inode *, xfs_off_t, xfs_off_t);
> +int xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(struct xfs_inode *, xfs_off_t, xfs_off_t, bool);
>
> void xfs_bmbt_to_iomap(struct xfs_inode *, struct iomap *,
> struct xfs_bmbt_irec *);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
> index 2f2dc3c09ad0..4246876df7b7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ xfs_fs_commit_blocks(
> (end - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(error);
>
> - error = xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(ip, start, length);
> + error = xfs_iomap_write_unwritten(ip, start, length, false);
> if (error)
> goto out_drop_iolock;
> }
> --
> 2.13.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-21 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-21 10:38 [PATCH] xfs: update i_size after unwritten conversion in dio completion Eryu Guan
2017-09-21 12:07 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-09-21 15:37 ` Eryu Guan
2017-09-21 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-21 15:40 ` Eryu Guan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170921120709.GA58956@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox