From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: perag initialization should only touch m_ag_max_usable for AG 0
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:12:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170921171258.GI7112@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170921140421.GA24142@infradead.org>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 07:04:21AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > We call __xfs_ag_resv_init to make a per-AG reservation for each AG.
> > This makes the reservation per-AG, not per-filesystem. Therefore, it
> > is incorrect to adjust m_ag_max_usable for each AG. Adjust it only
> > when we're reserving AG 0's blocks so that we only do it once per fs.
>
> This looks correct to me, but I hate how we manipulate a per-mount
> value. Is there a way we can just move this to the caller?
I'm not sure which caller you're referring to -- if you mean
xfs_ag_resv_init, then we'd still have the "if (pag->agno == 0)
xfs_mod_fdblocks(...)"; and if xfs_fs_reserve_ag_blocks then you'd have
to bubble the two ask values up out of xfs_ag_resv_init, which also
seems like a layering violation. Modifying fdblocks in
__xfs_ag_resv_init (Dave I think is sharpening his axe on that) smells
kinda funny but it's less code intensive.
<confused>
--D
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-21 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-19 18:10 [PATCH] xfs: perag initialization should only touch m_ag_max_usable for AG 0 Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-20 13:23 ` Brian Foster
2017-09-21 14:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-21 17:12 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170921171258.GI7112@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).