linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@redhat.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug Report]: generic/085 trigger a XFS panic on kernel 4.14-rc2
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 15:15:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171002221500.GA6503@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171001225849.GH3666@dastard>

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 09:58:49AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 11:28:57AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I hit a panic[1] when I ran xfstests on debug kernel v4.14-rc2
> > (with xfsprogs 4.13.1), and I can reproduce it on the same machine
> > twice. But I can't reproduce it on another machine.
> > 
> > Maybe there're some hardware specific requirement to trigger this panic. I
> > tested on normal disk partition, but the disk is multi stripes RAID device.
> > I didn't get the mkfs output of g/085, bug I found the default mkfs output
> > (mkfs.xfs -f /dev/sda3) is:
> > 
> > meta-data=/dev/sda3              isize=512    agcount=16, agsize=982528 blks
> >          =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
> >          =                       crc=1        finobt=1, sparse=0, rmapbt=0, reflink=0
> > data     =                       bsize=1024   blocks=15720448, imaxpct=25
> >          =                       sunit=512    swidth=1024 blks
> > naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0 ftype=1
> > log      =internal log           bsize=1024   blocks=10240, version=2
> >          =                       sectsz=512   sunit=32 blks, lazy-count=1
> > realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0
> 
> FWIW, I've come across a few of these log recovery crashes recently
> when reworking mkfs.xfs. The cause of them has always been either a
> log being too small or a mismatch between log size and log stripe
> unit configuration. The typical sign of that was either a
> negative buffer length like this one (XFS (dm-0): Invalid block
> length (0xfffffed8) for buffer) or the head/tail block initially
> being calculated before/after the actual log and so the log offset
> was negative.
> 
> I'm guessing the recent log validity checking we've added isn't as
> robust as it should be, but I haven't had time to dig into it yet.
> I've debugged the issues far enough to point to mkfs being wrong
> with xfs_logprint - it runs the same head/tail recovery code as the
> kernel so typically crashes on the same problems as the kernel. It's
> much easier to debug in userspace with gdb, though.....

Just to pile on with everyone else: I've noticed that fuzzing logsunit
to -1 causes the mount process to spit out a bunch of recovery-related
io errors.  Shortly thereafter the kernel crashes too.

--D

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-02 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-30  3:28 [Bug Report]: generic/085 trigger a XFS panic on kernel 4.14-rc2 Zorro Lang
2017-10-01 22:58 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-02 22:15   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-10-02 13:56 ` Brian Foster
2017-10-03  2:27   ` Zorro Lang
2017-10-13 13:29   ` Zorro Lang
2017-10-13 18:16     ` Brian Foster
2017-10-13 19:53       ` Brian Foster
2017-10-14 13:30         ` Zorro Lang
2017-10-14 22:34         ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-16 10:09           ` Brian Foster
2017-10-16 19:11             ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-16 22:26               ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-18 12:05                 ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171002221500.GA6503@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).