From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] xfsprogs: mkfs refactor
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:16:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171003171604.GC6503@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171003080607.GM15067@dastard>
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:06:07PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I've put the latest mkfs refactor code that I have up in place
> you can pull it from. I've rebased it against the current for-next
> tree (4.13.1 release) and fixed all the problems that xfstests
> exposes. The only thing I haven't fixed is xfs/191 that does mkfs
> command line behaviour verification because the refactored version
> fixes several problems that the old mkfs didn't handle correctly
> (e.g. being able to specify certain things like agsize in blocks or
> sectors).
>
> There's a small filter patch needed for xfstests that I'll post in
> a reply to this pull request that will filter out the new "defaults
> sourced from ..." output and so prevent spurious xfstests failures.
>
> If you want I can tag the branch with a signed tag for you to pull
> from (same process as Linus prefers) rather than just a branch in a
> tree. If you'd prefer that I post this as patches instead, then let
> me know and I'll bomb the list instead.
I had a look at mkfs-refactor. It looks ok to me (I defer to Eric on
the question of pull req. vs. patchbomb) though I have one question:
calculate_log_size calls max_trans_res, and max_trans_res assembles a
fake struct xfs_mount in order to call libxfs_log_calc_minimum_size.
I've fixed a few mkfs bugs over the past couple of years that all stem
from us forgetting to propagate superblock settings from the
configuration we're building in main() into the fake xfs_mount->m_sb
that we use to calculate the minimum log size, which results in a
disagreement between the kernel and mkfs as to what is the minimum log
size for a given fs configuration. This disagreement pops up in the
form of a freshly mkfs'd 500MB filesystem immediately failing to mount.
With this branch applied it looks like we've nearly finished filling out
the real xfs_mount->m_sb when we call calculate_log_size, so could we
refactor setup_superblock to set all the non-log superblock fields in
the real m_sb and then pass that directly into max_trans_res so that we
can memcpy the real superblock settings into the fake struct xfs_mount?
Doing that will eliminate a whole class of "we forgot that we have to
set sb_newfield in setup_superblock /and/ in max_trans_res and now mkfs
creates broken filesystems" bugs. Even now there are small
discrepancies between (for example) tr_itruncate.tr_logres in the kernel
and in mkfs, which make me nervous. AFAICT the discrepancies result in
mkfs using a minimum log size that is larger than what the kernel
calculates, so there's no user-visible badness.
--D
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
> The following changes since commit d4a36331dc383c7c7747e244b3ae20155ae92c98:
>
> xfsprogs: Release v4.13.1 (2017-09-26 20:45:05 -0500)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/xfsprogs-dev mkfs-refactor
>
> for you to fetch changes up to a4bc6d3c7bb5babc51f7341039dafcff5fcc6c7e:
>
> mkfs: tidy up definitions (2017-09-29 08:44:30 +1000)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Dave Chinner (42):
> mkfs: can't specify sector size of internal log
> mkfs: make subopt table const
> mkfs: introduce a structure to hold CLI options
> mkfs: add generic subopt parsing table
> mkfs: factor block subopts parser
> mkfs: factor data subopts parser
> mkfs: factor inode subopts parser
> mkfs: factor log subopts parser
> mkfs: factor meta subopts parser
> mkfs: factor naming subopts parser
> mkfs: factor rt subopts parser
> mkfs: factor sector subopts parser
> mkfs: Introduce mkfs configuration structure
> mkfs: factor printing of mkfs config
> mkfs: factor in memory superblock setup
> mkfs: factor out device preparation
> mkfs: factor writing AG headers
> mkfs: factor secondary superblock updates
> mkfs: introduce default configuration structure
> mkfs: rename top level CLI parameters
> mkfs: factor sectorsize validation
> mkfs: factor blocksize validation
> mkfs: factor log sector size validation
> mkfs: factor superblock feature validation
> mkfs: factor directory blocksize validation
> mkfs: factor inode size validation
> mkfs: factor out device size calculations
> mkfs: fix hidden parameter in DTOBT()
> mkfs: factor rtdev extent size validation
> mkfs: rework stripe calculations
> mkfs: factor device opening
> mkfs: factor data device validation
> mkfs: factor log device validation
> mkfs: factor rt device validation
> mkfs: factor AG geometry calculations
> mkfs: factor AG alignment
> mkfs: rework imaxpct calculation
> mkfs: factor initial mount setup
> mkfs: factor log size calculations
> mkfs: cleanup redundant temporary code
> mkfs: move error functions
> mkfs: tidy up definitions
>
> include/libxfs.h | 2 +-
> mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c | 4645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 2 files changed, 2602 insertions(+), 2045 deletions(-)
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-03 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 8:06 [GIT PULL] xfsprogs: mkfs refactor Dave Chinner
2017-10-03 8:21 ` fstests: update mkfs.xfs filters for new refactoring Dave Chinner
2017-10-03 17:16 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-10-03 20:07 ` [GIT PULL] xfsprogs: mkfs refactor Dave Chinner
2017-10-03 20:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-06 18:01 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-10-06 18:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2017-10-09 0:42 ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-09 3:11 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171003171604.GC6503@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).