linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/25] xfs: scrub the AGI
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 21:25:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171004042501.GO6503@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171004014347.GX3666@dastard>

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:43:47PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 01:41:59PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > Add a forgotten check to the AGI verifier, then wire up the scrub
> > infrastructure to check the AGI contents.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h  |    3 +-
> >  fs/xfs/scrub/agheader.c |   88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  fs/xfs/scrub/common.c   |    6 ++-
> >  fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.c    |    4 ++
> >  fs/xfs/scrub/scrub.h    |    1 +
> >  5 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> > index aeb2a66..1e326dd 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
> > @@ -487,9 +487,10 @@ struct xfs_scrub_metadata {
> >  #define XFS_SCRUB_TYPE_SB	1	/* superblock */
> >  #define XFS_SCRUB_TYPE_AGF	2	/* AG free header */
> >  #define XFS_SCRUB_TYPE_AGFL	3	/* AG free list */
> > +#define XFS_SCRUB_TYPE_AGI	4	/* AG inode header */
> >  
> >  /* Number of scrub subcommands. */
> > -#define XFS_SCRUB_TYPE_NR	4
> > +#define XFS_SCRUB_TYPE_NR	5
> >  
> >  /* i: Repair this metadata. */
> >  #define XFS_SCRUB_IFLAG_REPAIR		(1 << 0)
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/agheader.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/agheader.c
> > index 7fe6630..3d269c2 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/scrub/agheader.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/agheader.c
> > @@ -535,3 +535,91 @@ xfs_scrub_agfl(
> >  out:
> >  	return error;
> >  }
> > +
> > +/* AGI */
> > +
> > +/* Scrub the AGI. */
> > +int
> > +xfs_scrub_agi(
> > +	struct xfs_scrub_context	*sc)
> > +{
> > +	struct xfs_mount		*mp = sc->mp;
> > +	struct xfs_agi			*agi;
> > +	xfs_daddr_t			daddr;
> > +	xfs_daddr_t			eofs;
> > +	xfs_agnumber_t			agno;
> > +	xfs_agblock_t			agbno;
> > +	xfs_agblock_t			eoag;
> > +	xfs_agino_t			agino;
> > +	xfs_agino_t			first_agino;
> > +	xfs_agino_t			last_agino;
> > +	int				i;
> > +	int				level;
> > +	int				error = 0;
> > +
> > +	agno = sc->sm->sm_agno;
> > +	error = xfs_scrub_load_ag_headers(sc, agno, XFS_SCRUB_TYPE_AGI);
> > +	if (!xfs_scrub_op_ok(sc, agno, XFS_AGI_BLOCK(sc->mp), &error))
> > +		goto out;
> > +
> > +	agi = XFS_BUF_TO_AGI(sc->sa.agi_bp);
> > +	eofs = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks);
> > +
> > +	/* Check the AG length */
> > +	eoag = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_length);
> > +	if (eoag != xfs_scrub_ag_blocks(mp, agno))
> > +		xfs_scrub_block_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sa.agi_bp);
> 
> Should we be cross checking that the AGI and AGF both have
> the same length here?

Isn't that what this does?  Albeit indirectly?

xfs_scrub_ag_blocks returns sb_agcount for every AG except the last one.
For the last AG it returns (sb_dblocks - (all blocks in the other AGs))
which should be the same as agf->agf_length, right?

> > +
> > +	/* Check btree roots and levels */
> > +	agbno = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_root);
> > +	daddr = XFS_AGB_TO_DADDR(mp, agno, agbno);
> > +	if (agbno <= XFS_AGI_BLOCK(mp) || agbno >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks ||
> > +	    agbno >= eoag || daddr >= eofs)
> > +		xfs_scrub_block_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sa.agi_bp);
> 
> xfs_verify_agbno(), again :P
> 
> > +
> > +	level = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_level);
> > +	if (level <= 0 || level > XFS_BTREE_MAXLEVELS)
> > +		xfs_scrub_block_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sa.agi_bp);
> > +
> > +	if (xfs_sb_version_hasfinobt(&mp->m_sb)) {
> > +		agbno = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_free_root);
> > +		daddr = XFS_AGB_TO_DADDR(mp, agno, agbno);
> > +		if (agbno <= XFS_AGI_BLOCK(mp) ||
> > +		    agbno >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks ||
> > +		    agbno >= eoag ||
> > +		    daddr >= eofs)
> 
> Broken records are us....
> 
> > +			xfs_scrub_block_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sa.agi_bp);
> > +
> > +		level = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_free_level);
> > +		if (level <= 0 || level > XFS_BTREE_MAXLEVELS)
> > +			xfs_scrub_block_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sa.agi_bp);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Check inode counters */
> > +	first_agino = XFS_OFFBNO_TO_AGINO(mp, XFS_AGI_BLOCK(mp) + 1, 0);
> 
> Don't think this is right. AGFL, not AGI....

Yes.

> > +	last_agino = XFS_OFFBNO_TO_AGINO(mp, eoag + 1, 0) - 1;
> 
> Not sure this is right, either, because inode chunks won't be
> allocated over the end of the AG. hence if the eoag is not chunk
> aligned, there will be up to (chunk size - 1) blocks inodes won't be
> allocated in...

Yes.

> > +	agino = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_count);
> > +	if (agino > last_agino - first_agino + 1 ||
> > +	    agino < be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_freecount))
> > +		xfs_scrub_block_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sa.agi_bp);
> 
> Please don't use agino as a count of inodes - this confused me
> very much because I was wondering how these checks were in any way
> realted to valid AG inode numbers....

<nod> Sorry about that, will fix.

> > +
> > +	/* Check inode pointers */
> > +	agino = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_newino);
> > +	if (agino != NULLAGINO && (agino < first_agino || agino > last_agino))
> > +		xfs_scrub_block_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sa.agi_bp);
> > +	agino = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_dirino);
> > +	if (agino != NULLAGINO && (agino < first_agino || agino > last_agino))
> > +		xfs_scrub_block_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sa.agi_bp);
> 
> Perhaps we also need a xfs_verify_agino() helper here.
> 
> > +	/* Check unlinked inode buckets */
> > +	for (i = 0; i < XFS_AGI_UNLINKED_BUCKETS; i++) {
> > +		agino = be32_to_cpu(agi->agi_unlinked[i]);
> > +		if (agino == NULLAGINO)
> > +			continue;
> > +		if (agino < first_agino || agino > last_agino)
> > +			xfs_scrub_block_set_corrupt(sc, sc->sa.agi_bp);
> 
> This is effectively the same check as above:
> 
> 	if (agino != NULLAGINO && (agino < first_agino || agino > last_agino))
> 
> so all these checks could use the same helper to make it easier
> to read.

<nod> Will do.  Thank you for the review so far!

--D

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-04  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-03 20:40 [PATCH v11 00/25] xfs: online scrub support Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:40 ` [PATCH 01/25] xfs: create an ioctl to scrub AG metadata Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:41 ` [PATCH 02/25] xfs: dispatch metadata scrub subcommands Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:41 ` [PATCH 03/25] xfs: probe the scrub ioctl Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 23:32   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04  0:02     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04  1:56       ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04  3:14         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:41 ` [PATCH 04/25] xfs: create helpers to record and deal with scrub problems Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 23:44   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04  0:56     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:41 ` [PATCH 05/25] xfs: create helpers to scrub a metadata btree Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 23:49   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04  0:13     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:41 ` [PATCH 06/25] xfs: scrub the shape of " Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04  0:15   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04  3:51     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04  5:48       ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04 17:48         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:41 ` [PATCH 07/25] xfs: scrub btree keys and records Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04 20:52   ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:41 ` [PATCH 08/25] xfs: create helpers to scan an allocation group Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04  0:46   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04  3:58     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04  5:59       ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04 17:51         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:41 ` [PATCH 09/25] xfs: scrub the backup superblocks Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04  0:57   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04  4:06     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04  6:13       ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04 17:56         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:41 ` [PATCH 10/25] xfs: scrub AGF and AGFL Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04  1:31   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04  4:21     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04  6:28       ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04 17:57         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:41 ` [PATCH 11/25] xfs: scrub the AGI Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04  1:43   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04  4:25     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2017-10-04  6:43       ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04 18:02         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-04 22:16           ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-04 23:12             ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:42 ` [PATCH 12/25] xfs: scrub free space btrees Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-05  0:59   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-05  1:13     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:42 ` [PATCH 13/25] xfs: scrub inode btrees Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-05  2:08   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-05  5:47     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-05  7:22       ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-05 18:26         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:42 ` [PATCH 14/25] xfs: scrub rmap btrees Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-05  2:56   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-05  5:02     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:42 ` [PATCH 15/25] xfs: scrub refcount btrees Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-05  2:59   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-05  5:02     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:42 ` [PATCH 16/25] xfs: scrub inodes Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-05  4:04   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-05  5:22     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-05  7:13       ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-05 19:56         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:42 ` [PATCH 17/25] xfs: scrub inode block mappings Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-06  2:51   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-06 17:00     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-07 23:10       ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-08  3:54         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:42 ` [PATCH 18/25] xfs: scrub directory/attribute btrees Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-06  5:07   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-06 18:30     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:42 ` [PATCH 19/25] xfs: scrub directory metadata Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-06  7:07   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-06 19:45     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-06 22:16       ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-03 20:42 ` [PATCH 20/25] xfs: scrub directory freespace Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-09  1:44   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-09 22:54     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:43 ` [PATCH 21/25] xfs: scrub extended attributes Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-09  2:13   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-09 21:14     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:43 ` [PATCH 22/25] xfs: scrub symbolic links Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-09  2:17   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-03 20:43 ` [PATCH 23/25] xfs: scrub parent pointers Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:43 ` [PATCH 24/25] xfs: scrub realtime bitmap/summary Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-09  2:28   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-09 20:24     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-03 20:43 ` [PATCH 25/25] xfs: scrub quota information Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-09  2:51   ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-09 20:03     ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-09 22:17       ` Dave Chinner
2017-10-09 23:08         ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171004042501.GO6503@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).