public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_io: report io error for pwrite -W and -w
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 09:31:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171013133106.GD44461@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171012220245.GM7122@magnolia>

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 03:02:45PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:49:49PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote:
> > When IO error occurs, xfs_io -c "pwrite -W/w" doesn't report errors
> > while xfs_io -c "pwrite" -c "fsync" does.
> > 
> > This changes "pwrite -W/w" to report errors when it should.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
> > ---
> >  io/pwrite.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/io/pwrite.c b/io/pwrite.c
> > index 1c5dfca..71bcccc 100644
> > --- a/io/pwrite.c
> > +++ b/io/pwrite.c
> > @@ -379,11 +379,18 @@ pwrite_f(
> >  	}
> >  	if (c < 0)
> >  		goto done;
> > -	if (Wflag)
> > -		fsync(file->fd);
> > -	if (wflag)
> > -		fdatasync(file->fd);
> > +	if (Wflag) {
> > +		if (fsync(file->fd) < 0) {
> > +			perror("fsync");
> > +			goto done;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +	if (wflag) {
> > +		if (fdatasync(file->fd) < 0) {
> > +			perror("fdatasync");
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > +			goto done;
> 
> So this is a new behavior -- previously we'd print the timing info even
> if the f{data,}sync call fails.  I don't know that the timing matters if
> we fail to guarantee the data is on stable storage, but does anyone else
> have opinions?
> 

Seems like an Ok change to me. The manpage says that the f[data]sync()
call is included in the timing results, which implies that you'd
probably want to know if it outright failed. If you didn't want to time
the sync, then I'd think you wouldn't use -w.

Brian

> --D
> 
> > +		}
> > +	}
> >  	if (qflag)
> >  		goto done;
> >  	gettimeofday(&t2, NULL);
> > -- 
> > 2.9.4
> > 
> > @@ -390,0 +397,0 @@
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-13 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-12 20:49 [PATCH] xfs_io: report io error for pwrite -W and -w Liu Bo
2017-10-12 22:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-10-13 13:31   ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-11-07 17:37 ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171013133106.GD44461@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=bo.li.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox